We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 45

Unhappy meal
  • Hall & Wilcox
  • Australia
  • July 21 2014

The plaintiff was injured when he slipped and fell on stairs at a McDonalds restaurant. To access the counter at the restaurant, customers had to


Labour pains
  • Hall & Wilcox
  • Australia
  • March 20 2012

In late 2011, the first of five class actions arising from the 2009 Black Saturday Bushfires settled


Dangerous liaison
  • Hall & Wilcox
  • Australia
  • March 20 2012

The plaintiff suffered serious brain injury after a speed boat driven by her intoxicated partner at high speed collided with another boat


Nothing lost, plenty gained
  • Hall & Wilcox
  • Australia
  • March 20 2012

The plaintiff’s vehicle sustained damage totalling $29,091.67 as a result of the defendant’s negligent driving, and brought a proceeding in the Magistrates’ Court for that amount


Woolworths isn't Safeway
  • Hall & Wilcox
  • Australia
  • March 20 2012

Kathryn Strong lost a leg some years ago and, as a result, walked with crutches


Council goes down
  • Hall & Wilcox
  • Australia
  • December 24 2009

The failure of the Lorne Foreshore Committee to fence a steep embankment connecting a road with the beach in Lorne was held to breach its duty of care


Booze at own risk
  • Hall & Wilcox
  • Australia
  • December 24 2009

In a landmark decision of the High Court, a hotel publican has escaped liability for the death of an intoxicated patron


Twisting by the pool
  • Hall & Wilcox
  • Australia
  • September 25 2011

Mr Brookes was helping a relative, Mr Burton, to clear foliage in his garden


Deceased estates & testamentary trusts: sro confirms duty exemption
  • Hall & Wilcox
  • Australia
  • September 30 2011

Earlier this month, the State Revenue Office (SRO) clarified its position regarding section 42(1)(a) of the Duties Act 2000 (the Act), confirming it will treat a transfer from the executor to the trustee of the testamentary trust as if it were a transfer to a beneficiary, provided the transfer is in conformity with the trusts contained in the will of the deceased, and is not for valuable consideration


Must means must
  • Hall & Wilcox
  • Australia
  • March 20 2012

In Victoria the Wrongs Act 1958 establishes the procedure for determining whether an injured claimant satisfies the ‘significant injury’ threshold for the recovery of non-economic loss damages (pain and suffering etc