We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 48

Connecticut's proposed rule on registration of in-house counsel due for vote of judges
  • Day Pitney LLP
  • USA
  • June 25 2007

With all the things that a Connecticut company's in-house counsel has to worry about, being accused of practicing law without a license should not be one of them


Department of Labor clarifies same-sex marriage FMLA coverage following U.S. v. Windsor decision
  • Day Pitney LLP
  • USA
  • August 28 2013

On August 9, 2013, U.S. Department of Labor ("DOL") Secretary Thomas E. Perez issued guidance clarifying that same-sex spouses are eligible for


IRS issues DOMA guidance
  • Day Pitney LLP
  • USA
  • August 30 2013

On August 29, 2013, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) issued Revenue Ruling 2013-17 (the “Revenue Ruling”) providing guidance on the effect of the


T&E litigation update: Coyne v. Nascimento
  • Day Pitney LLP
  • USA
  • November 24 2010

In Coyne v. Nascimento, Case No. 10-P-12, 2010 Mass. App. Unpub. LEXIS 1251 (Nov. 19, 2010), a decision issued pursuant to Rule 1:28, the Appeals Court affirmed summary judgment against the plaintiff on statute of limitations grounds


Rivera v. Mackoul
  • Day Pitney LLP
  • USA
  • February 13 2012

In Rivera v. Mackoul, Case No. 10-P-1663, 2012 Mass. App. Unpub. LEXIS 120 (Feb. 3, 2012), a decision issued pursuant to Rule 1:28, the Appeals Court affirmed a judgment in favor of an estate planning attorney for fees incurred in a will contest, where the will was determined to be invalid pursuant to an agreement for judgment


Lifting the veil of secrecy
  • Day Pitney LLP
  • USA
  • October 31 2011

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder wrote the chair of the Advisory Committee on the Criminal Rules, recommending an amendment to Rule 6(e), which governs the secrecy of grand-jury materials


A lawyer's "privilege" to produce
  • Day Pitney LLP
  • USA
  • December 1 2011

The First Circuit rejected a series of arguments from the client of an attorney who received a grand-jury subpoena for the client's records


Add forfeiture to the inevitability of death and taxes
  • Day Pitney LLP
  • USA
  • December 1 2011

The Ninth Circuit held that if an indictment properly includes forfeiture allegations for an offense that authorizes criminal forfeiture, the sentencing court must impose forfeiture of the proceeds of the crime


Lowery v. RESCA
  • Day Pitney LLP
  • USA
  • November 18 2009

Case law relating to trusts and estates is constantly evolving


Estate of Beauregard
  • Day Pitney LLP
  • USA
  • February 23 2010

In Estate of Beauregard, SJC-10455 (Feb. 22, 2010), the Supreme Judicial Court affirmed the dismissal of a petition to probate a copy of the testator's will