We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 30,900

Alberta takes two meaningful steps towards renewing its climate change policy
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • Canada
  • July 1 2015

As Alberta's new provincial government looks to assert itself as a leader on climate change issues, it recently announced that it is taking


Opgepast: de PAS is vastgesteld en in werking!
  • Stibbe
  • Netherlands
  • July 1 2015

De Programmatische Aanpak Stikstof ("PAS") is vandaag op 1 juli 2015 in werking getreden. De PAS bestaat uit een wijziging van de


TSCA reform nears enactment with easy passage in the House
  • Beveridge & Diamond PC
  • USA
  • June 30 2015

The House of Representatives passed the TSCA Modernization Act of 2015 (H.R. 2576) on June 23, 2015 by a vote of 398 to 1, indicating that the


Michigan v. Environmental Protection Agency: cost considerations in agency regulations
  • Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
  • USA
  • June 30 2015

Yesterday in Michigan v. EPA, No. 14-46, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the EPA unreasonably determined that it should not consider costs in


Considerable costsSupreme Court requires EPA to consider cost impacts of power plant toxic emissions rules
  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • USA
  • June 30 2015

A closely divided Supreme Court has determined that EPA must consider cost when regulating emissions of hazardous air pollutants from stationary


US Supreme Court nixes EPA regulations on mercury emissions must consider costs early!
  • Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
  • USA
  • June 30 2015

In Michigan v. EPA, the U. S. Supreme Court invalidated EPA's rules limiting emissions of Mercury and other pollutants from power plants, ruling that


The ramifications of the Supreme Court’s Michigan v. EPA decision: five things you need to know
  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • USA
  • June 30 2015

On June 29, 2015, the Supreme Court reversed a D.C. Circuit decision upholding the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Mercury and Air Toxics


EPA’s Clean Water Act jurisdiction simplified? Think again. The devil is in the definition
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • June 30 2015

Yesterday, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released the final version of the Clean Water Rule (CWR), which defines categories of water


EPA releases study of hydraulic fracturing’s potential impacts on drinking water
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • June 30 2015

On June 4, 2015, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released an external review draft of a report assessing the potential impacts of


BC Premier’s 201516 mandate letters highlight policy priorities on LNG, climate change, oil spill safety and tailings pond management
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • Canada
  • June 30 2015

On June 12, 2015, British Columbia (BC) Premier Christy Clark issued updated mandate letters to her provincial cabinet ministers. The annual mandate