We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,760

Court affirms deferring jurisdiction to Legislatively established specialized tribunals
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • February 10 2016

On February 9, 2016 Madam Justice Kim Nixon of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench issued a significant administrative law decision in the case of


Northern Gateway: BC Supreme Court Rules that British Columbia Must Issue its Own EA Decision and Consult First Nations
  • Bennett Jones LLP
  • Canada
  • February 9 2016

In Coastal First Nations v British Columbia (Environment), 2016 BCSC 34, the court decided British Columbia must issue its own environmental decision


Can a Court Imply Terms in a Commercial Agreement?
  • Torkin Manes LLP
  • Canada
  • February 2 2016

As a general rule, Canadian Courts do not like implying terms in a commercial contract. The Courts do their utmost to avoid rewriting


Case Commentary: Coast First Nations v. British Columbia (Environment), 2016 BCSC 34
  • Miller Thomson LLP
  • Canada
  • February 1 2016

On January 13, 2016, the Coastal First Nations, an alliance of eight First Nations on British Columbia's North and Central Coast and Haida Gwaii


Putting the “Provincial” back into Federal-Provincial Cooperation: Assessing the Potential Implications of Coastal First Nations v. British Columbia (Environment)
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • Canada
  • January 28 2016

On January 13, 2016, the BC Supreme Court released its decision in Coastal First Nations v. British Columbia (Environment),1 which addressed the


Northern Gateway Pipeline - Province Must Consult and Decide But May Impose Conditions
  • Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP
  • Canada
  • January 26 2016

The Supreme Court of British Columbia recently released its decision in Coastal First Nations v. British Columbia (Environment),2016 BCSC 34, a legal


Canada: Quebec’s gas price class action will be split and heard in two stages
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • Canada
  • January 25 2016

In the context of this class action, the Quebec Superior Court recently granted a request to split the action, thereby splitting the trial into


Equivalency Agreements, Environmental Assessment and Aboriginal Consultation - Implications of Coastal First Nations v. British Columbia (Environment)
  • McMillan LLP
  • Canada
  • January 22 2016

Last week the BC Supreme Court released its decision in Coastal First Nations v. British Columbia (Environment), holding the Province could not rely


B.C. has authority to impose conditions on Northern Gateway Pipeline
  • Blake Cassels & Graydon LLP
  • Canada
  • January 19 2016

In its recent decision in Coastal First Nations v. British Columbia (Environment), the B.C. Supreme Court (Court) held that the provincial government


BC Hydro Responds to Complaint About Misleading Testimony at 2008 BCUC Hearing
  • Aird & Berlis LLP
  • Canada
  • January 19 2016

In December 2015, a complaint was made to the British Columbia Utilities Commission (BCUC) alleging that BC Hydro had intentionally misled the BCUC