We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,566

Implications of Padbury’s misleading ASX announcement
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • Australia
  • September 23 2016

A misleading ASX announcement can lead to ASIC prosecuting the listed entity and those officers who authorised the announcement. In the recent


When is a water treatment plant part of coal seam gas ‘prospecting’?
  • Corrs Chambers Westgarth
  • Australia
  • September 22 2016

A recent decision by Justice Moore in People for the Plains Incorporated v Santos NSW (Eastern) Pty Limited and Ors 2016 NSWLEC 93 (People for the


Put it on the JV tab: Increased scope for Operator to pursue plans and charge costs back to the JV
  • Gilbert + Tobin
  • Australia
  • September 15 2016

On 27 July 2016 Chaney J handed down his decision in the case of Santos (BOL) Pty Ltd v Apache Northwest Pty Ltd. This case is the latest decision in


International Trade Compliance Update - September 2016
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • Australia, Canada, European Union, United Kingdom, USA
  • September 7 2016

On 19 August 2016, the Russian Federation notified the WTO that it intends to initiate negotiations pursuant to Paragraph 1143 of the Working Party


Doing Business in Australia
  • DLA Piper LLP
  • USA, Australia, Global, OECD
  • September 7 2016

Australia is a great place to do business, offering a powerful combination of economic, legal and geographic advantages. Our 25 years of


A Greater Role for Australian Courts in Foreign Arbitral Proceedings?
  • Jones Day
  • Australia
  • September 6 2016

In the recent decision of Samsung C&T Corporation v Duro Felguera Australia Pty Ltd, the Supreme Court of Western Australia declined to make a


Characterisation of prospecting activities in NSW
  • McCullough Robertson
  • Australia
  • August 22 2016

The Land and Environment Court’s recent decision in the case of People for the Plains Incorporated v Santos NSW (Eastern) Pty Limited and Ors 2016


A CSG water treatment plant can be "prospecting" and does not need development consent in NSW
  • Clayton Utz
  • Australia
  • August 18 2016

The decision in People for the Plains confirms that petroleum title holders have broad latitude to undertake development without consent in some


Environment and Planning Law - National Review 2016
  • Clayton Utz
  • Australia
  • August 17 2016

At the time of writing the 2015 2016 Review, the Commonwealth Government was in caretaker mode, and the policy position to be taken in relation to


How the Personal Property Securities Act applies to universities
  • Minter Ellison
  • Australia
  • August 8 2016

Universities who sell property on retention of title terms, who hire, rent or lease out property, who buy or sell valuable second-hand property, who