We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 7,438

The Supreme Court’s EPA coal rules decision may still accelerate move to natural gas
  • Berger Singerman LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

The United States Supreme Court on June 29, 2015, saved electric utilities, and ultimately electric customers, billions of dollars a year when it

"Capacious" term dooms MATS Rule - does it say anything about the Clean Power Plan?
  • McCarter & English LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

The Energy Information Agency predicted the retirement of up to 60 gigawatts of coal-fired electricity generation by 2020. A significant contributor

Consumer products manufacturers take note: house passes chemical safety legislation
  • Arnold & Porter LLP
  • USA
  • June 25 2015

The US House of Representatives has decisively taken the lead in the two-step dance that could update and reinvigorate the nearly 40 year old Toxic

Green tea: a burgeoning and unexpected coalition bodes well for the geographic growth of renewables
  • Sullivan & Worcester LLP
  • USA
  • June 26 2015

In an era which often seems to be defined by partisanship, renewable energy has recently shown that it is one issue that can defy party lines

Supreme Court finds EPA unreasonably failed to consider costs when regulating power plant emissions
  • Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

Today the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) improperly refused to consider costs when it decided to

The Sidley shale gas and hydraulic fracturing report - June 29 2015
  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sent two proposed rules relating to oil and gas development to the White House Office of Management and Budget

Supreme Court rejects EPA's rule regulating hazardous air pollutants from power plants
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • June 30 2015

On June 29, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was wrong not to consider the cost of compliance when it

What comes next for mercury emissions from power plants?
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

The U.S. Supreme Court held this morning that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) acted unreasonably when it determined in 2000, and again

New York bans fracking in New York: what now?
  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • USA
  • December 17 2014

The wait is over in New York on fracking. At a cabinet meeting today Governor Cuomo and his Commissioners of Health and Environmental Conservation

U.S. Supreme Court limits EPA authority to regulate power plant emissions
  • Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court held that EPA must consider compliance costs before regulating hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) from coal- and oil-fired