We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 879

Utility protection: potential contractor and third party liabilities
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • May 7 2010

Sixth and final in a series


Ohio Supreme Court rules in favor of Secretary of State Husted in mandamus action involving oil and gas ballot initiative
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • September 16 2015

On September 16, 2015, the Ohio Supreme Court handed down a per curiam opinion a victory for both Secretary of State Jon Husted, who was


LEED rollback proposal tied to lobbyists
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • November 19 2014

Newly disclosed records show that Ohio Senate Concurrent Resolution 25, a measure critics say "would weaken Ohio's 'green' building standards," was


Will a complaint to regulate submeters lead to the regulation of onsite distributed generation as public utilities?
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • June 16 2015

Perhaps it’s no surprise, but the issue of submetering in Ohio is once again in the spotlight. A recent case filed with the Public Utilities


Another record-breaking winter peak load for PJM Interconnection
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • February 26 2015

Regional grid operator PJM Interconnection recently broke the winter peak load record set just last year during the polar vortex, Gongwer reports


AEP-Ohio capacity costs to competitive retail electric service providers
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • December 21 2010

On November 1, 2010, AEP Electric Power Service Corporation, on behalf of Ohio Power Company and Columbus Southern Power Company (collectively, “AEP-Ohio”), filed an application before FERC in FERC Docket No. ER11-1995 seeking authority to change the basis for compensation for capacity costs to a cost-based mechanism and included proposed formula rate templates under which the Companies would calculate their respective capacity costs under Section D.8 of Schedule 8.1 of the Reliability Assurance Agreement


Ohio House Bill 133: new opportunities for oil and gas development on state lands
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • June 27 2011

The development of Marcellus and Utica shale offers the State of Ohio exciting new opportunities for oil and gas production, economic development and job growth


Cleveland Indians’ Progressive Field to run on 100 wind energy
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • April 22 2016

Akron's FirstEnergy Corp. and the Cleveland Indians have announced that the utility company "will totally power" the team's Progressive Field with


Submeter victim asks legislators to protect consumers
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • December 8 2014

Martin Kobus of Lewis Center, Ohio, testified before the state's House Public Utilities Committee that he was "stunned to discover that he was paying


Belmont County updates transfer policy for oil, gas and minerals
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • October 16 2015

In response to the growing number of transfers of oil, gas and minerals, the Belmont County Auditor's Office released for the first time a written