We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 260

Religious discrimination: discipline for trying to convert a junior colleague was not unlawful
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • April 29 2016

A recent EAT ruling makes clear that, while disciplinary sanction for manifesting a religious belief is unlawful, an employer can lawfully discipline


UK: Restrictive covenants: BIS call for evidence; EAT ruling confirms unreasonable restraints cannot be bought
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • April 29 2016

As part of an initiative to develop a National Innovation Plan to help make Britain the most attractive place in Europe to start up new businesses


UK: Whistleblowing: employers face uphill struggle to strike out claims for lack of “public interest”
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • April 29 2016

A recent EAT ruling has highlighted that, in many cases, the prospects of striking out a whistleblowing claim at a preliminary hearing on the basis of


UK: TUPE: can apply to part of service split along functional lines
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • April 29 2016

The EAT has confirmed that, where a service being provided by a transferor is split along functional lines, with two separate activities carried out


UK: Discipline: raising non-urgent or trivial concerns while an employee is on stress-related sick leave may amount to constructive dismissal
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • April 29 2016

Employers should consider carefully whether it is necessary to raise disciplinary concerns with an employee while they are absent on stress-related


UK: Unfair dismissal: “taking a sickie” is gross misconduct
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • April 29 2016

An employer can fairly dismiss for gross misconduct where it has a genuine and reasonable belief (after reasonable investigation) that an employee


UK: Vicarious liability: Supreme Court’s broad application of “close connection” test means employers more likely to be liable for employee misbehaviour
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • March 17 2016

Employers could be held vicariously liable for staff misbehaviour in a broader range of situations following the Supreme Court ruling in Mohamud v WM


UK: Early conciliation: EAT rulings establish flexible approach to compliance
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • March 17 2016

A number of recent EAT rulings suggest that technical arguments over compliance with the early conciliation rules for tribunal claims may be given


Round-up of UK employment law developments in FebruaryMarch 2016
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • March 16 2016

The Government has published draft regulations providing for mandatory gender pay reporting; consultation ended on 11 March 2016 and a revised final


UK: EAT rejects appeal on inclusion of commission in holiday pay
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • February 23 2016

The EAT gave its judgment on the appeal in Lock v British Gas Trading yesterday. It upheld the tribunal's ruling that words can be written into the