We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 35

Tennessee Puts Rush Order On Data Breach Notifications
  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • USA
  • April 9 2016

Tennessee has amended its breach notification law to require notice within 45 days of discovery of a breach. This continues a trend of states'


Europe’s “Other” Court Sides With Employers on Employee Monitoring
  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • European Union
  • January 16 2016

Earlier this month, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) decided in Barbulescu v. Romania that European employers can monitor employee


Court Applies CFAA To “Inside Hacker”
  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • USA
  • December 19 2015

The United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin has held, in Epic Systems Corp. v. Tata Consultancy Services Limited, that an


Court finds lost revenue not compensable under CFAA
  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • USA
  • June 27 2015

The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California also ruled that lost business resulting from a former employee's theft of information


CFAA violation can be predicated on violation of company computer use policy, court finds
  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • USA
  • May 16 2015

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan has ruled, in American Furukawa, Inc., v. Hossain, that an employee at American Furukawa


Cannibal cop forced to eat a CFAA conviction
  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • USA
  • July 17 2014

You've surely heard about the New York City police officer who was charged with conspiring to kidnap his wife and other women so he could torture


France cuts back further on employee privacy
  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • France
  • July 27 2013

France's highest appeals court (Cour de cassation) has ruled, in Monsieur X v. Young & Rubicam France, that any content found on work-issued


District Court finds way around 9th Circuit’s limit on CFAA liability
  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • USA
  • March 30 2013

A federal district court in California has added another twist to the long-running saga of U.S. v. Nosal, holding that former employees could be


Whose law governs communication intercepts?
  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • USA
  • January 26 2013

The law governing the interception of customer or employee communications is only getting more muddled. Not only do different states have different


Michigan bans nosy employers
  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • USA
  • January 12 2013

Last month, Michigan enacted Public Act 478 of 2012 to become the latest state to bar employers and educational institutions from requiring, or even