We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,984

Dependent Contractors are Entitled to Reasonable Notice (and Potentially Lots of It)
  • Baker McKenzie
  • Canada
  • March 3 2016

The Ontario Court of Appeal recently confirmed not only that dependent contractors are entitled to reasonable notice of termination, but that 26

Public holiday pay- have you gotten it right?
  • Baker McKenzie
  • Canada
  • May 14 2015

With the long weekend coming up this Monday, May 18, it's a good time for a refresher on employee holiday pay. So before you pack up your things and

Are Arbitration Clauses in Award Agreements Arbitrary?
  • Baker McKenzie
  • USA
  • March 4 2016

Most equity plans include a governing law provision that provides that the plan and the awards granted under the plan are governed by the law of the

New Vacation Act from January 1, 2012
  • Baker McKenzie
  • Netherlands
  • November 30 2011

The new Vacation Act will enter into force on January 1, 2012

Obligations of Companies Employing Posted Workers - Have You Registered?
  • Baker McKenzie
  • Hungary
  • September 29 2016

The amendment of the Labor Code introduced new obligations on companies which employ workers posted to them by a foreign company. The new rules apply

Big changes for joint employers: what you need to know
  • Baker McKenzie
  • USA
  • September 9 2015

On August 27, in a highly anticipated decision, the National Labor Relations Board adopted a new joint employer standard, dramatically changing and

Agreement to arbitrate. District court holds that minor's pre-employment arbitration agreement is valid under California law, but upholds minor's right to disaffirm the arbitration agreement by commencing a lawsuit after reaching majority.
  • Baker McKenzie
  • USA
  • July 30 2015

Within one month after his eighteenth Birthday, Plaintiff brought a putative class action in California state court complaining that Kmart Corporation

Suspensions in the post-Potter age: key take-aways for employers (part 1)
  • Baker McKenzie
  • Canada
  • July 29 2015

In a previous post, we discussed the Supreme Court of Canada’s (“SCC“) decision in Potter v. New Brunswick (Legal Aid Services Commission), in which

Can you blame the booze? The fuzzy line between work and play
  • Baker McKenzie
  • Australia
  • July 13 2015

Aggressive and sexually inappropriate behaviour whilst under the influence of alcohol may be a harsh reason for dismissal if the employer supplied

The global employer: focus on Egypt
  • Baker McKenzie
  • Egypt
  • September 10 2015

Pursuant to Article 174 of the Companies Law (the “Companies Law”), Article 3 of the Minister of Labor Decree No. 136 of 2003 and Article 19 of the