We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 98,324

“Independent Contractor” or “Employee” in the Australian MLM industry? The Federal Court rules
  • Russell Kennedy
  • Australia
  • May 3 2016

In February we wrote to you outlining that the Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) had initiated court action in response to complaints by a store operator and


When It Comes To Harassment, Stop Doing It, And We’ll Stop Complaining About It!
  • FisherBroyles
  • USA
  • May 3 2016

While I was still mired in the quicksand of BigLaw, around year-end 2014, I posted on my employment discrimination blog about how women scientists


Boozin’ It Up When You Suspect Your Employee Is An Alcoholic
  • FisherBroyles
  • USA
  • May 3 2016

Who doesn't like a drink or two after work? But what happens when you, as the employer, suspect that one of your employees has a drug or alcohol


The Dangers of Overcooking When Poaching
  • K&L Gates
  • Australia
  • May 3 2016

As an employer, you want the best people working for your business. It's common to want to 'talk up' the business to a prospective employee and


Right to work checks: does an exception prove a rule?
  • Penningtons Manches LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • May 3 2016

In the case of Nayak v Royal Mail Group, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decided that Royal Mail acted reasonably in concluding that Mr Nayak


Employment Law This Week: Trade Secrets, Banker Bonus Restrictions, Musicians Are Employees, Misclassification Violates NLRA
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • May 2 2016

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit upholds a ruling against ex-employees for a trade secret violation. The Sixth Circuit has upheld a


Criminal activity and your employees: why you should exercise caution before hiring or firing employees based on criminal conduct
  • Jackson McDonald
  • Australia
  • May 2 2016

While it may appear obvious that an employer is entitled to hire and fire employees with reference to criminal conduct, both the Australian Human


La clause minorant l’indemnité de non-concurrence en cas de rupture à l’initiative du salarié est non-écrite
  • Flichy Grangé Avocats
  • France
  • May 2 2016

Ayant constaté que l’article 32 de la convention collective nationale de l’industrie textile du 1er février 1951, auquel se conformait le contrat de


Procédure conventionnelle de licenciement : la mention d’un délai erroné n’est pas nécessairement une violation de fond
  • Flichy Grangé Avocats
  • France
  • May 2 2016

Ayant constaté que le conseil avait été saisi par l’employeur qui envisageait un licenciement pour faute et que l’indication d’un délai erroné sur la


Procédure spéciale de licenciement : date limite de notification d’une candidature en l’absence d’entretien
  • Flichy Grangé Avocats
  • France
  • May 2 2016

Aux termes des articles L. 2411-7 et L. 2411-10 du Code du travail, si la procédure de licenciement ne nécessite pas d’entretien préalable