We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 34

After claim construction, district court allows opposing experts to testify to different definitions of "using" at trial and the jury can decide who had the better interpretation
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • July 1 2015

The parties filed opposing motions against each side's expert witness over a dispute between the parties as to what the word "use" means. In its


Americans with Disabilities Act: DOJ says website accessibility regulations are on the horizon
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • May 13 2015

At the National ADA Symposium in Atlanta yesterday, senior representatives of the Department of Justice (DOJ) acknowledged that the DOJ is committed


ADA defense lawyer: new ADA standards for website accessibility
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • January 1 2015

Since at least 2000, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has been advocating standardized website development and content to promote access to blind


Notice of appeal untimely where attorneys claimed that notice through electronic filing system did not start time for appeal
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • February 20 2014

After trial and the denial of post-trial motions, AT&T Operations, Inc. ("AT&T") filed motion to extend the time to file a notice of appeal pursuant


California’s do not track amendments
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • January 16 2014

Effective January 1, 2014, amendments to the California Online Privacy Protection Act ("CalOPPA") require all commercial websites and online services


Rembrandt v. Facebook: district court excludes damage expert where expert failed to apportion damages to patented features in accused product
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • December 11 2013

Rembrandt Social Media, LP ("Rembrandt") filed a patent infringement action against Facebook alleging that Facebook infringed two of its patents


Collecting customer information online
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • February 7 2013

In an opinion issued on February 4, 2013, the California Supreme Court (by a narrow 4-3 majority) resolved one of the burning questions in the


Chief Judge Kozinski rules in favor of Google finding Street View did not infringe Vederi's patents
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • October 15 2012

Vederi owns several patents which cover certain methods for enabling users to navigate a geographic area visually from a device, including a personal computer


The Federal Circuit continues to re-define what constitutes patentable subject matter under Section 101 after Bilski
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 27 2012

Bancorp Services, LLC (“Bancorp”) owns two United States patents, the 5,926,792 (“the ’792 patent”) and the 7,249,037 (“the ’037 patent”), both of which are entitled “System for Managing a Stable Value Protected Investment Plan.”


ESPN loses affirmative defenses and invalidity counterclaim on motion to dismiss but court recognizes unfairness in allowing "bare-bones" infringement complaint while prohibiting defendants from pleading affirmative defenses with brevity
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 19 2012

PageMelding filed a patent infringement action against ESPN asserting a patent that enables internet service and content providers to form mutually beneficial collaborations where website content is customized in accordance with those collaborations