We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 449

Financial services update Vol. 10, Issue 9
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • European Union, USA
  • March 9 2015

I recently had the opportunity to invest in individual shortterm real estate loans. Having devoted my current liquidity to a real estate


Financial services update vol. 10, issue 29
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • European Union, USA
  • August 24 2015

The United States Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) is once again pushing for regulations that would require


Anthracite vs Lehman Brothers finance s.a.
  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • July 20 2011

An English court judgment in Anthracite Rated Investments (Jersey) Limited and Lehman Brothers Finance S.A. Fondazione Enasarco and (1) Lehman Brothers Finance S.A. (2) Anthracite Rated Investments (Cayman) Limited was handed down by Justice Briggs on 15 July 2011


CDO fraud litigation and enforcement - 2011 survey
  • Lowenstein Sandler LLP
  • USA
  • June 23 2011

As of mid-2011, private plaintiffs and government regulators most prominently, the SEC continue to pursue fraud claims in connection with the marketing and sale of collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”


Talk tax quarterly news
  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • USA
  • July 22 2011

Just as we were going to press bemoaning the impending January 1, 2013 effective date of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, the Internal Revenue Service and Treasury Department announced an extension of the new provisions’ withholding and reporting requirements


Dexia SA cites Deutsche Bank's internal MBS descriptions in suit over $1 billion in RMBS purchases
  • Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
  • USA
  • July 25 2011

On July 13, 2011, Dexia SA filed a lawsuit in New York State Supreme Court against Deutsche Bank AG and several of its affiliates in connection with its purchase of more than $1 billion in RMBS between 2005 and 2007 from the Deutsche Bank defendants


The anti-deprivation principle and an Atlantic divide
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • United Kingdom, USA
  • September 23 2009

Structured finance transactions frequently subordinate a swap counterparty’s rights to termination payments upon termination of a swap by reason of counterparty default


Banking litigation update
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • July 19 2012

In Lomas, the Court of Appeal heard four joined appeals concerning the interpretation of various provisions of the ISDA Master Agreement


Lehman Brothers bankruptcy court strikes waterfall subordination provisions conditioned on bankruptcy
  • Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
  • USA
  • January 28 2010

On Jan. 25, 2010, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Bankruptcy Court”) held that a trust deed provision reversing a priority of payment waterfall upon the bankruptcy of a credit support provider under a swap agreement is unenforceable under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”


Enforceability of subordination provisions in synthetic CDOs a Lehman perspective
  • Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
  • United Kingdom, USA
  • February 3 2010

On January 25, 2010, the U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Peck struck down a provision that used the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. (“LBHI”) to trigger subordination of a Lehman subsidiary’s swap claim against a securitization vehicle in the United Kingdom