We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,681

Cavendish Square Holding BV (Appellant) v Talal El Makdessi (Respondent) & ParkingEye Limited (Respondent) v Beavis (Appellant) 2015 UKSC 67 On appeal from 2012 EWCA Civ 3852 Comm, 2013 EWCA Civ 1539 and 2015 EWCA Civ 402
  • Rosling King LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • November 27 2015

On 4 November 2015, the decision was handed down by the Supreme Court in the conjoined appeals of Beavis v ParkingEye Limited and Cavendish Square

Disputes digest - November 2015
  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • United Kingdom
  • November 26 2015

The Financial List is up and running. We were already proud of the thinking power of London’s judges, but the introduction of the List has given our

The private equity report- Fall 2015- vol. 15, number 2
  • Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
  • OECD, Russia, United Kingdom, USA
  • November 26 2015

Like other businesses today, private equity firms and their portfolio companies increasingly face serious data security threats - for example, from

A century on: the Supreme Court restates the law on penalties and liquidated damages
  • Eversheds LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • November 5 2015

When we think about a breach of contract and a remedy for that breach of contract, as often as not, we are thinking about damages - a monetary sum

Liquidated damages clauses and penalties a watered down principle?
  • Eversheds LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • November 5 2015

Pre-determining loss and damage for certain breach events is common place in many contracts and avoids the need for the innocent party to (i) prove

Joint ventures: when could you owe more than just contractual duties to the other member(s) of the venture?
  • Eversheds LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • October 30 2015

Under English law, the nature of their relationship in operating the joint venture can impose additional obligations beyond those in a joint venture

Employment law commentary, October 2015
  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • October 29 2015

Across industry sectors, there is one thing that all organizations have in commonpeople. Every organization needs a workforce to steer it in the

Defined benefits - a new conversation for financial sponsors and pension trustees on M&A processes
  • White & Case LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • October 22 2015

For potential investors, pension plans, safeguarded by seemingly more powerful trustees, can be one of the most significant elements of a deal. There

David v Goliath: the potential dangers of giving indemnities in a Share Purchase Agreement
  • Everyman Legal Ltd
  • United Kingdom
  • October 12 2015

The world of price comparison websites and the misleading of consumers who are buying insurance for classic motor cars lay behind this case: Wood v

The English court’s approach to interpretation of material adverse effect provisions
  • Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • October 8 2015

The English High Court recently considered whether a downward revision of a profit forecast would constitute a "material adverse effect" within the