We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 1,187

Disputes Digest - April 2017
  • CMS
  • United Kingdom, European Union, Global, Hong Kong, Singapore
  • April 18 2017

Welcome to our Spring edition of Disputes Digest. In this edition, we look back at 2016 and summarise the key litigation and


Should I stay or should I go? Singapore High Court declines to stay arbitration pending review of jurisdictional ruling
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • Global, Singapore
  • April 6 2017

In a recent ex tempore judgment in the case of Loblaw Companies Limited v Origin & Co Ltd & Another 2017 SGHC 59 ("Loblaw v Origin"), the


The Singapore High Court clarifies the law on staying arbitral proceedings
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • Singapore
  • April 5 2017

The recent judgment of the Singapore High Court in BLY v BLZ & Another 2017 SGHC 59 is of particular importance to users of arbitration in


SC on the significance of seat of arbitration
  • Khaitan & Co
  • India, Singapore
  • April 4 2017

Recently, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India (Supreme Court) in the case of Imax Corporation versus E City Entertainment India Private


Rong Shun Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd v C.P. Ong Construction Pte Ltd
  • Baker McKenzie
  • Singapore
  • March 31 2017

The Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act (the "SOPA") does not contain provisions that create a power to set aside an


Astro prevails again against First Media (Lippo) in Hong Kong
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • Hong Kong, Singapore
  • March 31 2017

In the long running AstroFirst Media (also known as Lippo) enforcement dispute, First Media has failed to obtain leave to appeal to the Court of


Third Party Funding in International Commercial Arbitration
  • Hardwicke
  • Hong Kong, Singapore
  • March 27 2017

In October 2016, the Hong Kong Law Reform Commission published the report ‘Third Party Funding for Arbitration’. The report follows the Law


Pathological Arbitration Clause Revisited
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • Singapore
  • March 27 2017

This was a case involving two separate disputes where the plaintiffs, KVC Rice and Tanasan Rice each agreed to sell 5,000 metric tons of rice in


Ang Cheng Guan Construction Pte Ltd v Corporate Residence Pte Ltd
  • Baker McKenzie
  • Singapore
  • March 15 2017

Under section 18 of the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act (the "SOPA"), a respondent who is aggrieved by an adjudication


UPDATE: Third-party funding of international arbitration now permitted in Singapore
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • Singapore
  • March 14 2017

We reported previously (here) on the Singapore Parliament's passage of the Civil Law (Amendment) Bill (Bill No. 382016) (Bill) on 10 January 2017