We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 128

Collado v. J & G Transport, Inc. - When a Waived Right to Arbitrate is Revived
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • April 26 2016

Some may have thought that once waived, the right to arbitrate is gone forever. No so! The Eleventh Circuit decision in Collado v. J & G Transport


Seventh Circuit Throws Out TransUnion’s Clickwrap Agreement and Incorporated Class Waiver
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • April 7 2016

In recent years, and in particular since decisions like AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011), a powerful defense to consumer class


Arbitration Provision Rejected in Franchise Dispute
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • Global, USA
  • March 29 2016

In Case Del Caffe Vergnano SPA v. ItalFlavors, LLC, the Ninth Circuit held that the court, not an arbitration tribunal, could review a franchise


The Fifth Circuit Addresses an Issue That Refuses to Die: Who Determines Whether Class or Collective Arbitration Is Available?
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • March 23 2016

We opined on several occasions that cases dealing with a party’s entitlement to class or collective arbitration were a dying breed because of the


The Board vs. the Courts: Will 2016 mark the final showdown for class action waivers in arbitration agreements?
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • January 25 2016

Arbitration agreements are practical tools that help employers protect confidential information and avoid the costs associated with traditional


Supreme Court Disconnects Plaintiffs’ Attempt to Avoid Class Arbitration Waiver
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • December 16 2015

In a 6-3 decision yesterday, the Supreme Court in DirecTV, Inc. v. Imburgia, 577 U.S. ___, S. Ct. (2015) reversed a decision of the California Court


The Next Chapter - Uber Responds to District Court Order With a New Arbitration Agreement
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • December 15 2015

Not only did Uber respond to the district court's December 9, 2015, ruling (discussed in our December 11 blog) with an immediate notice of appeal


District Judge Rules Uber’s Arbitration Agreements Unenforceable on Public Policy Grounds
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • December 11 2015

On September 2, we addressed the much-publicized O’Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc. case (No. 13-cv-03826-EMC) pending before the U.S. District


Day 1: Your First Five Questions (times four): a practical guide to the amended Federal Rules of Civil Procedure - proportionality
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • November 20 2015

The current amended Federal Rules of Civil Procedureand, in particular, those that address the practice of civil discoveryare the product of five


Justices take on another California rule when an arbitration agreement is too flawed to enforce
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • October 8 2015

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to review whether the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) preempts a California state court rule on unconscionable