We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 466

Restrictive Covenants - "One For All and All for One" Or Not as the Case May Be
  • Ashfords LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • January 4 2017

Strength in numbers, particularly in franchise disputes, can significantly shift a balance of power and bring about equality of arms in litigation

Health and safety law update, December 2016
  • RPC
  • United Kingdom
  • December 19 2016

KFG Quickserve Limited runs several food outlets, including 35 Burger Kings. On 28 March 2015 a 21-year old worker, Michael Firth, was emptying oil

Frustration of contracts - frustratingly elusive?
  • Penningtons Manches LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • November 29 2016

A frustrated contract is discharged automatically, with the parties excused from any further obligations. Because a frustrating event must not be

Bad hair day: High Court enforces restrictive covenants against former hair salon franchisee
  • Fieldfisher LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • November 29 2016

In Rush Hair Limited v Gibson-Forbes the English High Court considered whether two restrictive covenants relating to non-solicitation and

M&A Weekly Update 7 - 11 November 2016
  • Macfarlanes LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • November 11 2016

In this issue we look at a recent case on non-solicitation and non-compete covenants when buying a business, as

Court of Appeal decision illustrates high hurdle for establishing contract has been frustrated
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • November 8 2016

A recent Court of Appeal decision acts as a reminder that the court will not lightly conclude that a contract has been frustrated, particularly where

Calling it off: when is performance of a contract frustrated?
  • CMS
  • United Kingdom
  • November 7 2016

In the context of a services agreement, the Court of Appeal has provided further guidance on what will amount to a frustrating event. In reaching its

Tied back - High Court upholds two year non-solicitation and non-compete restrictions on seller of hairdressing business
  • Hogan Lovells
  • United Kingdom
  • October 31 2016

The dispute in Rush Hair Limited v Gibson-Forbes arose out of the sale of two hairdressing salons in Windsor and Maidenhead. The defendant had been

Franchise and Distribution Networks Newsletter - 4th Quarter 2016
  • Taylor Wessing
  • European Union, France, United Kingdom
  • October 27 2016

Conditions for reclassification of a distribution agreement as a franchise

Variation on a Theme - Do Variations to Franchise Agreements Have to be in Writing and Signed by the Parties?
  • Ashfords LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • October 11 2016

The short answer, following two recent Court of Appeal decisions, is - "unlikely" - even if that is what the franchise agreement says. There are an