We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 11,511

Supreme Court puts its “takings law” foot down
  • Beveridge & Diamond PC
  • USA
  • June 30 2015

Back on March 6, this correspondent reported in this blog on the twin takings cases of Horne v. Department of Agriculture about the raisin-growing


U.S. Supreme Court finds lenders and developers can be liable for unintentional discrimination under the Fair Housing Act
  • Husch Blackwell LLP
  • USA
  • June 30 2015

The U.S. Supreme Court held on June 25, 2015, that disparate-impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act (FHA). In a 5-4 decision, the


Nutter bank report, June 2015
  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • USA
  • June 30 2015

The FDIC is seeking public comments on a proposed rule that would change the way small banks are assessed for deposit insurance. Under the June 16


Supreme Court decides disparate treatment case under Fair Housing Act
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

In a much-anticipated decision, the United States Supreme Court held on June 25, 2015, in a 5-4 decision, that disparate impact claims are cognizable


Enforcing pet restrictions in condominiums
  • Aird & Berlis LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

Many pet owners who have breached the pet restrictions in their condominium documents will go to great lengths to keep their pet when the condominium


Supreme Court upholds ‘disparate impact’ under the FHA but emphasizes that claims cannot rely on statistics alone
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

In a much-anticipated decision, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project


U.S. Supreme Court finds disparate impact claims cognizable under FHA
  • Burr & Forman LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

This case arose from a dispute regarding where housing for low-income persons should be constructed in Dallas, Texasthat is, whether low-income


Supreme Court decision in inclusive communities clarifies parameters for disparate impact discrimination liability
  • Arnold & Porter LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

On June 25, 2015, nearly four years after first agreeing to consider the question, the Supreme Court issued a decision holding that disparate impact


Is matching required in Missouri?
  • Merlin Law Group, PA
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

In the area of property damage law, one of the hot topics these days is matching. If only a portion of a structure is damaged and the material to be


California Appellate Court holds tender not required for HBOR
  • Maurice Wutscher LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

The Court of Appeal of the State of California, Second District, recently reversed a trial court's dismissal of a complaint alleging a servicer