We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 316,271

A joint author does not own derived material
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 27 2015

Addressing joint and derivative works under the Copyright Act, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit found the district court erred in


Amgen and Apotex do the biosimilar patent dance
  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • USA
  • August 27 2015

Amgen has filed a complaint under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA), asserting that a biosimilar application filed by Apotex


Steps that simply map out an application on a computer do not confer patent eligibility
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 27 2015

Again addressing the issue of subject-matter eligibility of computer-implemented claims, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found two


Copyright preemption notwithstanding no copyright protection and no copyright claims
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 27 2015

In a suit alleging trade secret theft of ideas related to a software program, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed both a lower


Statute permits domestic discovery for foreign opposition proceedings
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 27 2015

With ample citation to Supreme Court precedent, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the use of 28 U.S.C. 1782 to conduct


TTAB states documents filed on same day are filed at same time
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 27 2015

In a precedential decision, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board stated that it “shall not take cognizance of fractions of a day” and ruled that


Petitioners only get one bite at the same part of the apple
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 27 2015

In a decision to institute Inter Partes Review (IPR), the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) determined that the petitioner was estopped


New regulations aimed to stop private equity managers from converting fee income to capital gains
  • Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads LLP
  • USA
  • August 27 2015

It's well-known that private equity managers often pay capital gain rates on their "carried interest" - typically, a 20 percent profit allocation for


PTAB clarifies requirements for claim amendments
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 27 2015

In an order perhaps indicating that the tide is turning for patent owners seeking to amend claims in Inter Partes Review (IPR), an expanded panel of


Do Amazon.com’s search results constitute trademark infringement?
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 27 2015

Holding that a reasonable jury could find that online retailer created a likelihood of consumer confusion through the format of its product search