We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,049

Supreme People’s Court of China announces judicial interpretation: civil judgments of Taiwan to be recognized and enforced
  • Lee and Li Attorneys at Law
  • China, Taiwan
  • July 29 2015

June 30, 2015 marked the sixth anniversary of the Agreement for Cross-Strait Judicial Mutual Assistance. On the same day, China's Supreme People's

What’s in a name? A salutary tale of financial instruments, fraud and jurisdictional wrangling
  • Andrews Kurth LLP
  • China, United Kingdom
  • July 28 2015

Exclusive jurisdiction clauses or arbitration agreements are meant to ensure that disputes are heard in a single forum that is acceptable to both

Mainland China to expand the scope of judicial recognition on Taiwan’s civil judgments and arbitral awards
  • Tsai Lee & Chen Patent Attorneys & Attorneys at Law
  • China
  • July 27 2015

On June 30th, 2015, the Supreme People’s Court of China announced two judicial interpretations: the “Supreme People’s Court’s Regulations on

The Supreme People’s Court issues guidance on CIETAC’s jurisdiction
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • China
  • July 17 2015

On 15 July 2015, the Supreme People's Court published "The Supreme People's Court's Reply to the Request Made by Shanghai High Court and Others in

SPC clarifies jurisdiction issues arising from the CIETAC split
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • China
  • July 17 2015

On 15 July 2015, the Supreme People's Court in China (the "SPC") issued a binding judicial interpretation on how lower courts are to handle various

Supreme People’s Court issues long-awaited clarification on CIETAC split
  • Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP
  • China
  • July 17 2015

The Supreme People’s Court of China (SPC) issued its long-awaited notice (the Notice) on the CIETAC split yesterday. The Notice clarifies the

Certain important rules for recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awards set forth in new interpretation of the Civil Procedure Law by the Supreme People’s Court
  • HaoLiWen
  • China
  • July 16 2015

The Interpretation on the Application of the Civil Procedure Law of PRC (the "Interpretation") was issued by the Supreme People's Court on January 30

International arbitrationquarterly review June 2015
  • Addleshaw Goddard LLP
  • China, Hong Kong, Qatar, Singapore, United Arab Emirates
  • July 3 2015

In AQZ v ARA 2015 SGHC 49, the Singapore High Court had to consider, for the first time, an application to set aside an award made under the

How to understand “Material Change of Objective Circumstance”
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • China
  • June 19 2015

There were increasing labor disputes arising from the termination of employment contract by the employer on the basis of material change of objective

  • Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP
  • China, Hong Kong
  • June 18 2015

本更新简报概述多项仲裁最新发展包括 香港法律项下同意由国际商会仲裁院"在中国"进行仲裁的效果 现有香港仲裁条例项下香港首例禁诉令