We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,299

Improper Service Poses Risk for Enforcement of Awards
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • China, Hong Kong
  • September 20 2016

Improper service in arbitration proceedings has been commonly relied upon as a ground by PRC courts to set aside or refuse enforcement of arbitral


One Step Forward, Two Steps Back - PRC Court refuses to enforce an ICC award on the ground of public policy
  • Hogan Lovells
  • China
  • September 20 2016

In Wicor Holding A.G. V. Taizhou Haopu Investments Limited (Civil Action (2015) Tai Zhong Shang Zhong Shen Zi No. 00004), the Taizhou Intermediate


Enforcing foreign arbitral awards in China - a review of the past twenty years
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • China
  • September 15 2016

Over the past three decades China has become a significant player in the global market. Chinese companies are active sellers and purchasers of goods


One Arrangement, Two Systems: considerations when enforcing awards between Hong Kong and the PRC
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • China, Hong Kong
  • September 15 2016

The foundational instrument for the enforcement of international arbitral awards, the New York Convention (the “Convention”), has made arbitral


Enforcing against foreign State parties: Some lessons from abroad
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia, China, Hong Kong, United Kingdom, USA
  • September 15 2016

Parties doing business with foreign States should think carefully about the doctrine of state immunity, and how it might limit any rights they hold


Taizhou Intermediate People’s Court Refuses Recognition and Enforcement of ICC Award on Basis of Public Policy
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • China, Hong Kong
  • September 13 2016

In Taizhou Haopu Investment Co., Ltd. v Wicor Holding AG, Taizhou Court, P. R. China, Case Docket Number: 2015 Tai Zhong Shang Zhong Shen Zi, No


Anti-Monopoly Disputes - Arbitration or Litigation?
  • CMS
  • China
  • September 12 2016

On 29 August 2016 the Jiangsu High People's Court made a judgement that anti-monolpoly disputes between two companies are not


Anti-Monopoly Disputes Are Not Arbitrable According to Chinese Court
  • Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
  • China
  • September 7 2016

On August 29, the Jiangsu Provincial Higher People's Court ruled that an arbitration clause did not apply to an anti-monopoly dispute in a 10 million


Challenges, opportunities and road ahead for International Arbitration in BRICS
  • Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr
  • Brazil, China, India, Russia, South Africa
  • September 1 2016

On 27 August 2016, the Conference on International Arbitration in BRICS: Challenges, Opportunities and Road Ahead took place in New Delhi, India. The


Failure to Specify Arbitral Seat in the Arbitration Clause May Result in Unenforceable Award
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • China, Hong Kong
  • August 26 2016

In a recent PRC case (the “Taizhou Court Case”), the Taizhou Intermediate People’s Court (“Court”) refused enforcement of an ICC award on grounds of