We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 763

Square pegs in round holes: adjusting claims involving rideshare drivers
  • Miller Thomson LLP
  • Canada
  • November 23 2015

CampusLifts. Haxi. Kangaride. Lyft. Sidecar. Summon. UberX. Wingz. Sound familiar? They are colloquially known as "rideshare" services or

Uber: and the new ‘gig’ economy: what are the implications for the future?
  • Blaney McMurtry LLP
  • Canada
  • November 5 2015

In the last few months all of us have become aware of Uber and its entrance into the "passenger courier" business. In many cities throughout the

Rail regulator opens consultation new enfORRcement principles
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • October 27 2015

The Office of Rail and Road (ORR), the body responsible for enforcing health and safety legislation on the rail network, completed a consultation on

R. v. Michaud: Ontario Court of Justice has broad powers on appeal from Part 1 Provincial Offences Act decisions
  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • Canada
  • October 22 2015

The Ontario Court of Appeal's decision in R. v. Michaud comprehensively considers the powers of a judge of the Ontario Court of Justice to review an

P3 projects use less contingency per infrastructure Ontario Report
  • Nossaman LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • October 12 2015

This is the second of two posts about the recent Infrastructure Ontario 2015 Track Record Report. As mentioned in the earlier post about

Report finds Ontario P3s exceed industry standards for on-budget and on-time performance
  • Nossaman LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • October 12 2015

This is the first of two posts about the recent Infrastructure Ontario 2015 Track Record Report. As the public-private partnership (P3) market in the

Canada: judicial recognition of risk assessment, R. V. Michaud
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • Canada
  • September 29 2015

The Ontario Court of Appeal has recently released its decision in R. V. Michaud, 2015 ONCA 585 (“Michaud”). This decision is of importance as the

Good news for motor vehicle financiers in Saskatchewan
  • Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
  • Canada
  • September 23 2015

Saskatchewan is in the process of updating its consumer protection legislation with respect to the sale and leasing of motor vehicles. On August 20

U.S. automakers take the wheel on cybersecurity but can Canadian manufacturers hitch a ride?
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • Canada
  • September 2 2015

This summer, U.S. automakers pledged to ramp up motor vehicle cyber protection measures by launching a new centre for cybersecurity intelligence and

Vicarious liability of vehicle owner - what if the vehicle owner provided limitations on the use of the vehicle?
  • Torkin Manes LLP
  • Canada
  • August 18 2015

The Court of Appeal in the August 10th, 2015 decision in Fernandes v. Araujo et al. addressed the vicarious liability of an owner of a vehicle for