We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,325

Reflections & Expectations
  • Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
  • Asia-Pacific, Central & Eastern Europe, European Union, France, Germany, Global, USA
  • April 28 2015

Everyone is talking about cybersecurity. And why not? In the past year, cyberattacks have made headlines as never before. Major companies in a number


Financial services update Vol. 10, Issue 11
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • European Union, USA
  • March 23 2015

This edition focuses on corporate governance and its Related Issues. In particular, academics from the School of Accountancy at Singapore Management


General counsel update - march 2015
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • Australia, China, European Union, Hong Kong, United Kingdom, USA
  • March 5 2015

Protecting your investments: further public consultation to be launched on Investment Protection in the USEU Free Trade Agreement


General counsel update September 2014
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • Hong Kong, Russia, United Kingdom, USA, Australia, China, European Union
  • September 29 2014

The London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) Court's new rules come into force on 1 October 2014 and are to apply to any arbitration


International Regulatory Update 23-27 September 2013
  • Clifford Chance LLP
  • Australia, China, European Union, Germany, Global, Guernsey, Singapore, South Korea, United Kingdom, USA, Hong Kong, Japan, Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Russia
  • October 1 2013

The UK government has launched a legal challenge with the European Courts of Justice (ECJ) on the remuneration provisions under the Capital


General Counsel Update - June 2013 - A summary of major developments in key areas
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • USA, Australia, European Union, Singapore, United Kingdom
  • June 21 2013

The Companies Act 2006 (Strategic Report and Directors' Report) Regulations 2013 (Regulations) to amend the structure of UK annual reports have


International regulatory update 7 - 11 January 2013
  • Clifford Chance LLP
  • Global, India, Poland, Singapore, United Kingdom, USA, European Union, France
  • January 14 2013

EMIR: Extension of scrutiny period for Commission Delegated Regulations Basel III: Basel Committee releases revised version of Liquidity Coverage


Recent developments for the fourth quarter 2011
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • Canada, China, Denmark, European Union, Switzerland, United Kingdom, USA, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Netherlands
  • March 15 2012

The end of the year and beginning of a new year is always a busy time for us, as it is for most of our clients


Recent decision of judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of EU in Akzo Nobel Chemicals, et al v. European Commission imperils attorney client privilege for foreign based subsidiaries, including in U.S. tax proceedings and non-tax proceedings
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • European Union, USA
  • June 26 2011

In a decision that has wide-sweeping implications for companies that are doing business in the EU or otherwise become a party to a legal or administrative proceeding governed by the EU, as well as to American persons engaged, directly or indirectly such as through ownership of a controlled subsidiary or company in the EU, the Grand Chamber of the EU Court affirmed the decision of the Court of First Review (trial court) holding that various claims of legal privilege made by Akzo Nobel Chemicals and Akcros Chemicals for communications made to the companies' in-house companies were not privileged and thus were discoverable under by the European Commission


The Akzo Nobel decision: a warning to the unwary
  • Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP
  • European Union, USA
  • September 28 2010

The recent decision of the European Court of Justice in Akzo Nobel is an important reminder of the perils of assuming that jurisdictions outside the United States give the same status to in-house counsel as our own courts