We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 821

TRAB finds Class 17 goods similar to Class 11 goods
  • Wan Hui Da Law Firm & Intellectual Property Agency
  • China
  • July 20 2015

The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board (TRAB) has found that scupper hoses in Class 17 are similar to shower pipes in Class 11 with respect to


The Procuratorate and the court adopt the opinion of the brand owner in calculating the case value of criminal case against a trademark counterfeiter
  • Wan Hui Da Law Firm & Intellectual Property Agency
  • China
  • July 20 2015

In this case, there was a wide gap between the calculation of the illegal turnover made by the Police during the raid (170,000 RMB) and the


The TRAB recognized the trademark use in OEM context as effective use in the sense of the trademark law
  • Wan Hui Da Law Firm & Intellectual Property Agency
  • China
  • July 20 2015

The trademark "MIRRO", of the French company SEB was the object of an application for Cancellation based on alleged non-use for three consecutive


The CTMO applies Article 15.2 of the new Trademark Law in an opposition case filed before the entry into force of the law
  • Wan Hui Da Law Firm & Intellectual Property Agency
  • China
  • July 20 2015

The China Trademark Office upheld the opposition against the trademark application filed by a company affiliated to the distributor of the Opponent


由知名球队名称被申请注册谈商标法10 条 1 款 8 项的适用
  • CCPIT Patent & Trademark Law Office
  • China
  • July 17 2015

商标法10 条 1 款 8 项一直以来属于争议比较大的条款在适用该条款时商标局商评委和法院“似乎”有着不同的评判标准


Trademark comparing: disclaimed part no longer valid even with distinctiveness
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • China
  • July 16 2015

What should we concern: when determining the level of similarity between trademarks, it should be limited to comparing the part that the citation


Trademark invalid: registering in others’ name with no authorisation
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • China
  • July 15 2015

What should we concern: registered trademark, filed in the name of others without others' authorisation should be deemed as "obtained through means


Registered trademark invalid based on prior copyright infringement
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • China
  • July 15 2015

What should we concern: prior copyright shall be regarded as a prior right being protected in China; a registered mark, which is substantively


Descriptive fair use and other trade mark infringement defences
  • Rouse
  • China
  • July 13 2015

Each year, the Supreme People’s Court issues a report on intellectual property and unfair competition cases heard during the year and, on the basis of


China’s Supreme People’s Court selects top 10 significant IP cases of 2014
  • Hogan Lovells
  • China
  • July 7 2015

China's Supreme People's Court ("SPC") has published its list of the "top 10 significant IP cases" for 2014, which it has done since 2007. The list