We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,072

从最高院改判“泰山大帝”商标案看“其他不良影响”的判断
  • Jiaquan IP Law Firm
  • China
  • August 16 2016

近日最高人民法院对一枚核准注册并使用十余年的“泰山大帝”商标因其可能对宗教信仰宗教感情或者民间信仰造成伤害容易造成不良社会影响最终判决应予撤销


Court rules misleading online promotion of genuine goods constitutes unfair competition
  • Wan Hui Da Law Firm & Intellectual Property Agency
  • China
  • August 15 2016

In a recent decision the Changsha Intermediate People's Court applied Article 2 of the Anti-unfair Competition Law and found that an online vendor


China Newsletter, Summer 2016 No. 34
  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • China
  • August 10 2016

On March 23, 2016, the State Administration of Taxation (the Tax Bureau) and Ministry of Finance released the Notice of Overall Pilot Execution of


Nike Succeeded in Custom IP Enforcement
  • Jiaquan IP Law Firm
  • China
  • August 7 2016

Last week, 1,872 pairs of shoes were determined to be infringing products by Xiamen Customs of Fujian Province. These shoes were claimed to be


権利者の消滅になった引用商標は後願商標の登録にとって阻害になるか
  • LexField Law Offices
  • China
  • August 5 2016

最近北京知識産権法院と北京市高級人民法院の判決書は引用商標の権利者が消滅になって且つ権利義務の承継がない場合当該商標が依然と先行して有効商標であるにしても後願商標の登録にとって権利の支障にならないはずであると表明した具体的な案件の状況は下記の如きである即ち


A welcome trend: China’s Supreme People’s Court rules damages should be proportional to fame in trademark infringement cases
  • Hogan Lovells
  • China
  • August 4 2016

In a recent appeal, China’s Supreme People’s Court (“SPC“) found in favour of Michelin against Sen Tai Da and related parties (“Sen Tai Da“) for


A sigh of relief: Guangdong Higher People's Court reduces record trademark damages award in its New Balance appeal judgment.
  • Hogan Lovells
  • China
  • August 3 2016

On 23 June 2016, the Guangdong Higher People's Court handed down its long-awaited judgment in the New Balance新百伦-case. In its judgment, the Court


重点在于确定“因侵权”所获利益 从“新百伦案”谈“反向混淆”赔 偿额计算
  • Wan Hui Da Law Firm & Intellectual Property Agency
  • China
  • August 1 2016

反向混淆商标案件与正向混淆案件相比损害后 果有所不同因而在赔偿金额的确定应当考虑权 利人被诉侵权商标的品牌价值涉案权利商标的 使用在被诉侵权产品销售中所起的作用等 日前"新百伦"案二审宣判赔偿金额从 "9800 万元"调整为"500 万元"二审判决中据


斯蒂尔公司橙灰颜色组合商标注册后 首获司法保护的启示
  • Wan Hui Da Law Firm & Intellectual Property Agency
  • China
  • August 1 2016

该案是斯蒂尔公司自其颜色商标获准注册以来的 第一例民事判决书对后续的维权工作具有指 导性的意义 日前泰州市中级人民法院下达了德国安德 烈·斯蒂尔股份两合公司"斯蒂尔公司"诉泰 州某园林机械公司的颜色商标侵权的民事判决书 认定被告在链锯上使用和斯蒂尔公司近似的橙灰颜


欧盟法院近日认定实体市场经营者有 责任制止商户的侵权行为
  • Wan Hui Da Law Firm & Intellectual Property Agency
  • China, Czech Republic, European Union
  • August 1 2016

欧盟法院在针对捷克最高院请示的 C-49415 号案 件的初裁中指出根据欧盟知识产权执法条 例200448EC第 11 条市场经营者需制止 商户的侵权行为 本案中Delta Center 公司租用 Prague 市场的场 地并将场地转租给若干商户Lacoste 公司法国