We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 280

Failure to Specify Arbitral Seat in the Arbitration Clause May Result in Unenforceable Award
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • China, Hong Kong
  • August 26 2016

In a recent PRC case (the “Taizhou Court Case”), the Taizhou Intermediate People’s Court (“Court”) refused enforcement of an ICC award on grounds of


China’s New Judicial Interpretation Clarifies Criteria and Punishment for Bribery Offences
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • China
  • August 8 2016

The Supreme People’s Court (“SPC”) and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate’s (“SPP”) have released the Interpretation of Several Issues


China Tax Monthly - May 2016
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • Hong Kong, China
  • July 11 2016

On 6 June 2016, the State Administration of Taxation (SAT) issued Bulletin 35 to implement the agreement between the SAT and the Inland Revenue


New Regulations on Vocational School Interns
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • China
  • June 30 2016

On April 11, 2016, the Ministry of Education, Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security and three other ministries jointly issued the


Doing Business With China: Is Your Arbitration Clause Worth The Paper on Which It Is Written?
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • Hong Kong, Israel, China
  • June 27 2016

Since diplomatic relations with China began in 1992, Israeli-Sino trade volume has risen steadily, from US$50 million in 1992 to US$9.9 billion in


Court Rejects Employee’s Challenge to Legality of Company Policies
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • China
  • June 7 2016

In May 2016, the Jimei District Court in Xiamen dismissed an employee’s challenge to the legality of the company’s policy adoption procedure, and as


Beijing Intermediate Court Provides Views on Various Labor Dispute Issues
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • China
  • June 7 2016

On April 27, 2016, the Beijing No. 3 Intermediate People’s Court (“Court”) held a press conference regarding its annual review of labor disputes


Court Rules Against Employer on Termination for Serious Violation of Company Rules
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • China
  • June 7 2016

The Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate People’s court reportedly ruled that a company had wrongfully terminated an employee’s contract on the grounds of a


First “Right to be Forgotten” Case Denied by Beijing Court
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • China
  • June 7 2016

The Haidian District Court of Beijing recently denied an employees’ request to remove the link between his name and that of his previous employer


Employee Termination for Misuse of Sick Leave Upheld by Court
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • China
  • June 7 2016

In a recent Jiangsu Province case, a court held that a company had lawfully terminated an employee for misusing her sick leave. The employee joined