We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 432

案例研究:一带一路争议选择香港作为仲裁地
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Hong Kong, China
  • November 18 2016

中国的“一带一路”倡议在带来投资机遇的同时也要求企业更谨慎地开展风险管理在开展任何投资前协议各方应考虑选择何种方式解决争议并确保在合同中写入相关条款


General counsel update - march 2015
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • Australia, China, European Union, Hong Kong, United Kingdom, USA
  • March 5 2015

Protecting your investments: further public consultation to be launched on Investment Protection in the USEU Free Trade Agreement


Inside arbitration issue: Perspectives on cross-border disputes - July 2016
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom, China, European Union, Global, Hong Kong
  • July 2 2016

It is over two and a half years since the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) published its Arbitration Guide, which provides both


Should arbitral awards that have been set aside be enforced in a different jurisdiction?
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • China, Hong Kong
  • April 30 2013

Achieving a favorable arbitral award is sometimes the easy part of the dispute resolution process. Where the successful party is awarded money


Confidentiality in Asia-based international arbitrations
  • Jones Day
  • China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Singapore, United Kingdom
  • February 28 2012

The rise of Asia as an economic powerhouse over the past decade has also led to the region becoming a hub for international arbitration


Hong Kong Court of Appeal allows enforcement of prc arbitral award and provides important guidance on objections to arbitral procedure and "arb-med"
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • China, Hong Kong
  • December 8 2011

In Gao Haiyan and another v. Keeneye Holdings and another CACV 792011, the Hong Kong Court of Appeal has allowed the enforcement of a mainland Chinese arbitral award, reversing a decision of the Court of First Instance to refuse enforcement on the grounds of public policy


Taizhou Intermediate People’s Court Refuses Recognition and Enforcement of ICC Award on Basis of Public Policy
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • China, Hong Kong
  • September 13 2016

In Taizhou Haopu Investment Co., Ltd. v Wicor Holding AG, Taizhou Court, P. R. China, Case Docket Number: 2015 Tai Zhong Shang Zhong Shen Zi, No


Failure to Specify Arbitral Seat in the Arbitration Clause May Result in Unenforceable Award
  • Baker McKenzie
  • China, Hong Kong
  • August 26 2016

In a recent PRC case (the “Taizhou Court Case”), the Taizhou Intermediate People’s Court (“Court”) refused enforcement of an ICC award on grounds of


International arbitrationquarterly review June 2015
  • Addleshaw Goddard LLP
  • China, Hong Kong, Qatar, Singapore, United Arab Emirates
  • July 3 2015

In AQZ v ARA 2015 SGHC 49, the Singapore High Court had to consider, for the first time, an application to set aside an award made under the


Hong Kong court casts doubt on enforceability of ICC awards made in mainland China
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • China, Hong Kong
  • March 11 2015

The Hong Kong Court of First Instance has declined to set aside a partial award for lack of jurisdiction where the arbitration clause provided for