We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 11-20 of 329

International arbitrationquarterly review June 2015
  • Addleshaw Goddard LLP
  • China, Hong Kong, Qatar, Singapore, United Arab Emirates
  • July 3 2015

In AQZ v ARA 2015 SGHC 49, the Singapore High Court had to consider, for the first time, an application to set aside an award made under the

CIETAC issued the 2015 Arbitration Rules
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • China, Hong Kong
  • April 8 2015

On November 14, 2014, China Council for the Promotion of International Trade revised and adopted the China International Economic and Trade

Should arbitral awards that have been set aside be enforced in a different jurisdiction?
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Hong Kong, China
  • April 30 2013

Achieving a favorable arbitral award is sometimes the easy part of the dispute resolution process. Where the successful party is awarded money

Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal refuses leave to appeal in the Grand Pacific v. Pacific China case
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • China, Hong Kong
  • February 26 2013

The Court of Final Appeal ("CFA") in Hong Kong has refused to interfere with the leading judgment on the setting aside of arbitral Awards in Hong

Hong Kong Court of Appeal allows enforcement of prc arbitral award and provides important guidance on objections to arbitral procedure and "arb-med"
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • China, Hong Kong
  • December 8 2011

In Gao Haiyan and another v. Keeneye Holdings and another CACV 792011, the Hong Kong Court of Appeal has allowed the enforcement of a mainland Chinese arbitral award, reversing a decision of the Court of First Instance to refuse enforcement on the grounds of public policy

General counsel update: 31 May 2012
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • Argentina, China, European Union, Hong Kong, Singapore, Spain, United Kingdom
  • May 31 2012

This is the twenty-ninth in our series of General Counsel Updates which aim to summarise major developments in key areas

non-convention enforcement of arbitral awards in mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan
  • Mayer Brown LLP
  • China, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan
  • December 19 2011

The People’s Republic of China (PRC) today has three separate legal systems

Chinese award challenged on public policy grounds in Hong Kong
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • China, Hong Kong
  • January 7 2011

The enforcement of an arbitral award issued in mainland China in relation to a share transfer dispute has been challenged recently in the Hong Kong Courts in Gao Hai Yan and another ("Gao and Xie") v Keeneye Holdings Ltd and others HCCT 412010 on grounds that it would be contrary to public policy

Dispute resolution in Asia
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • Australia, China, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore
  • December 6 2011

The 4th edition of the Dispute Resolution in Asia aims to bring together the expertise of our lawyers in the region and help our clients understand the complexities of the various legal systems, courts and dispute resolution proceedings of the different jurisdictions in Asia Pacific

India clears obstacle to enforcement of mainland China and Hong Kong arbitral awards by notifying China as New York Convention territory
  • Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
  • China, Hong Kong, India
  • April 26 2012

The Indian Ministry of Law and Justice has declared the People’s Republic of China (including Hong Kong and Macau) to be a territory to which the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (“the New York Convention” or “the Convention”) applies