We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 310

India announces that it will now recognize and enforce arbitral awards from China and Hong Kong
  • Latham & Watkins LLP
  • China, Hong Kong, India, Macau
  • May 16 2012

The Indian Ministry of Law and Justice has declared that arbitral awards made in China (including Hong Kong and Macau) may be recognized and enforced by Indian courts


non-convention enforcement of arbitral awards in mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan
  • Mayer Brown LLP
  • China, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan
  • December 19 2011

The People’s Republic of China (PRC) today has three separate legal systems


India clears obstacle to enforcement of mainland China and Hong Kong arbitral awards by notifying China as New York Convention territory
  • Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
  • China, Hong Kong, India
  • April 26 2012

The Indian Ministry of Law and Justice has declared the People’s Republic of China (including Hong Kong and Macau) to be a territory to which the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (“the New York Convention” or “the Convention”) applies


International Regulatory Update 23-27 September 2013
  • Clifford Chance LLP
  • Australia, China, European Union, Germany, Global, Guernsey, Singapore, South Korea, United Kingdom, USA, Hong Kong, Japan, Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Russia
  • October 1 2013

The UK government has launched a legal challenge with the European Courts of Justice (ECJ) on the remuneration provisions under the Capital


General counsel update
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • Indonesia, Mongolia, Singapore, United Kingdom, USA, China, European Union, Germany, Hong Kong
  • July 11 2012

This is the thirtieth in our series of general counsel updates which aim to summarise major developments in key areas


Dispute resolution in Asia
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • Australia, China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Vietnam, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand
  • December 6 2011

The 4th edition of the Dispute Resolution in Asia aims to bring together the expertise of our lawyers in the region and help our clients understand the complexities of the various legal systems, courts and dispute resolution proceedings of the different jurisdictions in Asia Pacific


Hong Kong Court of Appeal allows enforcement of prc arbitral award and provides important guidance on objections to arbitral procedure and "arb-med"
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • China, Hong Kong
  • December 8 2011

In Gao Haiyan and another v. Keeneye Holdings and another CACV 792011, the Hong Kong Court of Appeal has allowed the enforcement of a mainland Chinese arbitral award, reversing a decision of the Court of First Instance to refuse enforcement on the grounds of public policy


Enforcement of mainland Chinese arbitration award refused on public policy grounds in Hong Kong amid warnings on the dangers of arb-med
  • Dentons
  • China, Hong Kong
  • May 9 2011

The Hong Kong Court of first instance has refused to enforce an arbitration award issued by the Xian Arbitration Commission on public policy grounds where one of the arbitrators acted as both arbitrator and mediator in the case of Gao Haiyan and Another v Keeneye Holdings Ltd and Another


General counsel update: 31 May 2012
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • Argentina, China, European Union, Hong Kong, Singapore, Spain, United Kingdom
  • May 31 2012

This is the twenty-ninth in our series of General Counsel Updates which aim to summarise major developments in key areas


Hong Kong Court of Appeal enforces Chinese arbitration award
  • Dentons
  • China, Hong Kong
  • December 29 2011

The Hong Kong Court of Appeal recently overturned the decision in Gao Haiyan and Another v Keeneye Holdings Ltd and Another in which the Court of First Instance had refused on public policy grounds to enforce an arbitration award by the Xian Arbitration Commission