We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,174

Applications for leave to appeal dismissed - 28 January 2016
  • Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
  • Canada
  • January 28 2016

The applicant, Mr. Luu, was petitioned into bankruptcy in Hong Kong in February, 2012. He was also involved in litigation in British Columbia and was


Ontario court finds cellphone tower “metadata” is private
  • Blake Cassels & Graydon LLP
  • Canada
  • January 20 2016

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Court) recently ruled in R. v. Rogers Communications that broad cellphone "tower dump" production orders are


Phone Companies after R v. Rogers: Constitutional Guardians or Agents of the State?
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • Canada
  • January 20 2016

People love their phones. Phones now accompany us pretty much wherever we go, whatever we do. People use their phones in church, in restaurants, at


Production order challenge results in recognition of duty to assert consumer privacy rights
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • January 19 2016

On January 14th, 2016, in R. V. Rogers Communications, Sproat J. Of the Superior Court of Justice issued a very important decision for organizations


Dragnet No More? Recent guidance on production orders
  • Dentons
  • Canada
  • January 18 2016

On January 14, 2016, a judge of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice issued a series of guidelines for future production orders directed to


Not So Fast, Not So Much - Data Protection for Cell Tower Traffic Data
  • Bennett Jones LLP
  • Canada
  • January 21 2016

In the context of criminal investigations police in Canada may obtain “tower dump” production orders. These are orders requiring the applicable


Tower dump production orders: Restricting police access to cellular records in R v. Rogers Communications
  • Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
  • Canada
  • January 19 2016

“Was the person at the Blue Jays game instead of at work?” In his decision in R v. Rogers Communication, Justice Sproat of the Ontario Superior


Cell Phone “Tower Dump” Violates Privacy Rights
  • Wortzmans
  • Canada
  • January 14 2016

The protection of privacy has prevailed in a landmark decision about whether the Peel Regional Police violated the Charter rights of Rogers and Telus


Work and Play All in One Mitigating Risks of Security Incidents and Privacy Breaches in BYOD Programs
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • Canada
  • January 8 2016

Given the popularity and prevalence of mobile devices such as smart phones and tablets in today’s world, it is no surprise that Bring Your Own Device


Telus agrees to pay $7.34 million in customer rebates to resolve false and misleading advertising allegations
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • January 11 2016

On December 30, 2015, the Competition Bureau announced that it had reached a consent agreement with Telus Communications Inc., one of Canada's "Big