We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 2,258

Mckesson: Respondent’s factum filed
  • Dentons
  • Canada
  • August 26 2014

Earlier this year, McKesson Canada Corporation appealed the decision of the Tax Court of Canada in McKesson Canada Corporation v. The Queen (2013 TCC


Applications for leave to appeal dismissed- 5 March 2015
  • Gowling WLG
  • Canada
  • March 5 2015

On appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario pronounced August 14, 2014. The respondent commenced a wrongful dismissal suit against


TCC affirms broad interpretation of Holdco ITC rules
  • Thorsteinssons LLP
  • Canada
  • March 9 2015

The recent decision of the Tax Court of Canada (TCC) in Miedzi Cooper Corporation v. The Queen, 2015 TCC 26, should put to bed a needlessly ongoing


FCA dismisses Lord Black’s tax appeal
  • Dentons
  • Canada
  • December 18 2014

Earlier this year, in Black v. HMQ (2014 TCC 12), Lord Conrad Black unsuccessfully argued in the Tax Court of Canada that, due to his U.K. Residency


Applications for leave to appeal dismissed- 18 December
  • Gowling WLG
  • Canada
  • December 18 2014

On appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia pronounced August 5, 2014. The applicant and several other people attacked


Applications for leave to appeal granted- 18 December
  • Gowling WLG
  • Canada
  • December 18 2014

On appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Quebec pronounced May 15, 2014. The respondent pleaded guilty to two counts of impaired


Surrender of stock option by executive generated a capital gain
  • Thorsteinssons LLP
  • Canada
  • December 8 2014

In The Estate of the Edward S. Rogers v. The Queen, 2014 TCC 348, the Tax Court of Canada (TCC) held that the surrender of stock options in 2007 to


CRA: tax treatment of Ponzi scheme investments
  • Dentons
  • Canada
  • July 10 2014

We have previously written about court decisions on the tax results arising from taxpayers' (failed) investments in Ponzi schemes (see our posts on


FCA interprets section 95(6)(b) of the Income Tax Act (Canada)
  • Thorsteinssons LLP
  • Canada
  • April 24 2014

The Federal Court of Appeal has handed down its decision in the Lehigh Cement case on the scope of the antiavoidance rule in section 95(6)(b) of the


TCC dismisses taxpayer’s motion in Mcintyre
  • Thorsteinssons LLP
  • Canada
  • April 23 2014

The Tax Court of Canada recently released its decision in the McIntyre case. The court dismissed the taxpayer's motion, holding that the Minister is