We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 657

Reasonable offer prevents litigious complainant from proceeding at BC Human Rights Tribunal
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • Canada
  • February 21 2017

A recent decision of the BC Human Rights Tribunal (“Tribunal”) serves as a useful reminder of the utility of a reasonable settlement offer, which can


Bill S-201 and the Protection Against Genetic Discrimination.
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • Canada
  • February 9 2017

You have done testing to determine whether you have a genetic predisposition to certain medical conditions. The results come back: You do. This is


Amending certification applications: When does the “procedural guillotine” fall?
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • Canada
  • February 6 2017

In recent certification decisions, BC courts have demonstrated a willingness to permit plaintiffs to amend their materials and re-apply for


Minimum Wage Increases in 2017
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • Canada
  • February 6 2017

Minimum wage increase are on the horizon for employees across Canada. On October 1, 2016, the general minimum wage increased to $12.20 per


Canada is one step closer to legalizing cannabis and workplace safety is top of mind
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • Canada
  • January 31 2017

On November 30, 2016, the Task Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation presented its Final Report to the federal government. The Report sets out


The Alberta Court of Appeal clarifies the organizing principle of good faith with style
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • Canada
  • January 30 2017

In Styles v Alberta Investment Management Corporation (“Styles”), the Alberta Court of Appeal provided useful guidance on the application of the


The Alberta Court of Appeal clarifies the organizing principle of good faith with style
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • Canada
  • January 30 2017

In Styles v Alberta Investment Management Corporation (“Styles”), the Alberta Court of Appeal provided useful guidance on the application of the


Défaut de respecter une ordonnance d’injonction en matière de concurrence déloyale : votre ex-employé pourrait être déclaré coupable d’outrage au tribunal!
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • Canada
  • January 27 2017

La situation suivante n’est guère un cas d’exception : un employé quitte son emploi au sein de son employeur (ou bien se fait mettre à la porte) et


Incentive Plans In Alberta Can Still Limit Entitlements to “Actively Employed” Employees
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • Canada
  • January 11 2017

The recent Queen’s Bench decision Styles v. AIMC was widely discussed given that it found an employee was entitled to LTIP awards vesting after


Occupational Health and Safety Legislation and Manslaughter Charges - An Important Reminder for Employers and Supervisors
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • Canada
  • December 9 2016

On October 31, 2016, the Québec Superior Court issued its decision in R v. Fournier, concluding that a business owner’s breach of occupational health