We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-7 of 7

Is contractual interpretation a common issue?
  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • Canada
  • August 26 2014

Canadian courts routinely certify the interpretation of contracts as common issues in class actions. Following the Supreme Court of Canada's recent


Ontario Court of Appeal holds that companies trading exclusively on foreign exchanges can be “responsible issuers” in Ontario
  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • Canada
  • April 4 2012

On March 30, 2012, the Court of Appeal for Ontario released its decision in Abdula v. Canadian Solar Inc., 2012 ONCA 211


Non-Arbitrable Claims Appropriate for Class Certification
  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • Canada
  • March 15 2016

In the ongoing saga of Seidel v Telus Communications Inc., the BC Supreme Court was asked to certify the few claims that survived the enforceable


Ontario Court of Appeal upholds liability for tort of intentional interference with economic relations
  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • Canada
  • March 11 2016

The Ontario Court of Appeal has now emphasized that the tort of intentional interference with economic relations has narrow applicability, but does



Mary Paterson
  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP

Alberta court grants Encana’s application for a stay of action and referral to arbitration
  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • Canada
  • April 22 2016

On April 12, 2016, the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench stayed an action started by Toyota Tsusho Wheatland Inc. (TTWI) against Encana Corporation