We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 81

The SEC’s universal proxy proposal: How it affects Canadian companies and investors
  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • November 17 2016

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has proposed amendments to its proxy rules that are designed to allow shareholders using the proxy


‘A New Day Has Arrived’: Continued Focus on Individual Wrongdoing
  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • November 4 2016

The “Yates Memo,” which instructs United States prosecutors to focus on individual wrongdoers when investigating or prosecuting alleged corporate


What will become of the U.S. DebtEquity Proposal?
  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • August 5 2016

When the U.S. Treasury Department issued proposed debtequity regulations on April 4, 2016 (the Proposed 385 Regulations), the impact of these rules


The Board’s Role in Crisis Management
  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • May 18 2016

Whether a private or public company, a not-for-profit, a Crown corporation or government agency, every enterprise will face a crisis sooner or later


Major U.S. anti-inversion regulations impact Canadian companies both in and out of the inversion sandbox
  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • April 11 2016

On Monday April 4, 2016, the U.S. Treasury Department released a comprehensive set of temporary regulations that are designed to stop the flow of


Arbitration clauses: the impact on class actions in Canada and the United States
  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • November 12 2015

As we have discussed before, the public policy rationales for enforcing arbitration agreements are arguably at odds with the policy rationales


Individual accountability for corporate wrongdoing: a perspective from United States practice as reflected in the Yates Memorandum
  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • September 24 2015

On September 9, 2015, Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates of the United States Department of Justice ("DOJ") issued a memorandum entitled "Individual


A tale of two jurisdictions: evidentiary threshold at certification
  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • January 22 2015

It has been the best of times for Canadian class action plaintiffs: an unprecedented level of attention from Canada’s top court has affirmed Canada’s


Osler webinar : internal investigations
  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • November 29 2013

Formation qui se veut un guide pour mener à bien des enquêtes internes multijuridictionnelles axées sur la conformité à la loi anticorruption d’un


“Don’t ask, don’t waive” standstill provisions and the board’s duty to stay informed
  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • January 30 2013

A trio of Delaware Court of Chancery rulings in 2012 have re-emphasized a target board’s duty to stay informed of material information throughout all