We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 582

Groia v. The Law Society of Upper Canada
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • August 31 2016

Groia v. The Law Society of Upper Canada, 2016 ONCA 471, provides guidance regarding counsel's duty of zealous advocacy in the context of counsel's


Insurance Corp. of British Columbia v. Alexander
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • August 23 2016

Participants in Stanley Cup Riot were not jointly and severally responsible for all the damage caused to vehicles insured by ICBC during the riot


Zheng v. John Galon Insurance Services Ltd
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • August 23 2016

Where an insurance application specifically asks whether an insured property will have renters or tenants, and the insured answers 'no,' an insured


Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Co. of Canada v. Chubb Insurance Co. of Canada
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • August 23 2016

In a trademark infringement claim coverage for "advertising injury" was not clearly excluded by "Expected or Intended Advertising Injury or Personal


MacPherson v. White
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • August 23 2016

A plaintiff's insurer may be added as a party to a tort action where the tortfeasor's insurance limits will likely be insufficient, and the plaintiff


Peddle v. Newfoundland and Labrador Pharmacy Board
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • July 26 2016

The Applicant Pharmacist (Mr. Peddle) was successful in an application for judicial review. His licensing body (the Respondent, the Newfoundland and


College of Chiropractors of British Columbia v. Health Professions Review Board
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • July 26 2016

The BC Supreme Court found the Health Professions Review Board ("HPRB") committed a reviewable error in the exercise of its statutory powers in


Ontario (Director, Racing Commission) v. Ontario (Racing Commission)
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • July 26 2016

The Director of the Ontario Racing Commission (the "Applicant") applied for judicial review of a decision made by a panel of the Commission (the


Heritage Capital Corp. v. Equitable Trust Co
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • July 26 2016

The Supreme Court of Canada confirmed that while correctness is the appropriate standard of review for interpretation of the common law and statute


Supreme Court Civil Rules: Part 9
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • July 26 2016

Part 9 of the Supreme Court Civil Rules provides an array of tools to dispose of a case (or slices of it) before trial. One of the more obscure of