We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 353

Court awards damages for patent infringement in second part of a bifurcated decision
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • June 30 2016

Court awards damages for patent infringement in second part of a bifurcated decision Janssen Inc. v. Teva Canada Limited, 2016 FC 593 Drug:


Court disallows pleading amendments that are found to have no reasonable prospect of success
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • June 15 2016

Teva has lost both of its appeals seeking to amend its pleading to add in a claim that the patent at issue had been fraudulently obtained by


Pleadings amendments are allowed to particularize what a party would have done in the "but for" world
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • June 15 2016

This is an action where Apotex has claimed section 8 damages against AstraZeneca. The Court had previously ruled on a motion to determine objections


Hearsay statements regarding the generic's ability to supply in the "but for" world should have been excluded
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • June 15 2016

A Judge of the Federal Court had previously awarded Teva section 8 damages under the PM(NOC) Regulations. The Court provided the key findings of fact


Ontario Superior Court again refuses to strike claims pursuant to the Statute of Monopolies and the Trade-marks Act
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • June 15 2016

The defendant corporations sought to strike Apotex's claims to: Treble damages pursuant to s 4 of An Act concerning Monopolies and Dispensation with


Application for prohibition is struck on motion after the Court construes the patent and finds no infringement
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • June 15 2016

Celltrion has successfully struck a prohibition application brought by Janssen after Celltrion sought to add indications to its already approved drug


Supreme Court Leaves to Appeal - June 15, 2016
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • June 15 2016

The Supreme Court has dismissed Britton Low's appeal from a decision of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia (2015 BCCA 506). We had previously


Life Sciences Legal Trends in Canada
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada, European Union, United Kingdom, USA
  • June 6 2016

The doctrine of “sound prediction” was ushered into Canadian law as a means to protect useful inventions. A review of the case law, however, reveals


When removing a named inventor, evidence that the remaining individuals are the sole inventors is not necessary
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • May 25 2016

Qualcomm sought to remove a named inventor who was added to a patent through inadvertence or mistake. The named inventor provided affidavit evidence


A finding of a settlement agreement is overturned because counsel did not have the authority to bind his client
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • May 25 2016

The Federal Court of Appeal has overturned the earlier finding that Allergan and Apotex had settled their patent infringement litigation (2015 FC