We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 369

Commercial Court finds it did not have jurisdiction to permit service of an application for Norwich Pharmacal relief out of the jurisdiction
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • September 9 2016

In a recent decision, the Commercial Court found that it did not have jurisdiction to permit service out of the jurisdiction in respect of an


Commercial Court finds commitment letter unsigned by one party to be legally binding
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • July 26 2016

The recent decision of the Commercial Court in Novus Aviation Limited v Alubaf Arab International Bank BSC(c) 2016 EWHC 1575 (Comm), serves as a


Alexander v West Bromwich Mortgage Company Ltd: When can lenders rely on contradictory mortgage conditions?
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • July 25 2016

In Alexander v West Bromwich Mortgage Company Ltd 2016 EWCA Civ 496, the Court of Appeal considered the right of a lender to rely on standard term


Alexander v West Bromwich Mortgage Company Ltd: When can lenders rely on contradictory mortgage conditions?
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • July 25 2016

In Alexander v West Bromwich Mortgage Company Ltd 2016 EWCA Civ 496, the Court of Appeal considered the right of a lender to rely on standard term


Court of Appeal decision on inconsistency clauses in context of lenders’ reliance on contradictory mortgage conditions
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • July 25 2016

A recent Court of Appeal decision provides a useful reminder of the courts' approach to resolving inconsistency in cases where there is an


UK competition class action regime out of the starting blocks
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • July 22 2016

After a slow start, use of the UK's new competition collective redress regime is now gathering pace. The first opt-out class action application, on


More firsts for competition litigation - CAT awards Sainsbury's damages of £68.6m (plus compound interest) against MasterCard
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • July 15 2016

On 14 July the UK Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) issued its judgment in the damages claim brought by Sainsbury's against MasterCard. The CAT found


ミャンマー投資ガイド - 2016年4月
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • Myanmar, United Kingdom, USA
  • June 28 2016

1948年に英国から独立した後ミャンマー1は 武力衝突と政情不安の時代に突入しました 1962年に軍部の率いる社会主義革命が起きて からは軍事政権による統治が続きました が


Qadir v Barclays: High Court gives helpful guidance on limitation periods in IRHP mis-selling litigation
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • June 14 2016

Following a series of decisions considering similar issues, the High Court has again granted a bank's application to strike out an interest rate


Court of Appeal gives guidance for bankers' references: what to include in a request for reference and the circumstances in which liability may be avoided
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • June 9 2016

The recent decision of the Court of Appeal in Playboy Club London Ltd & Ors v Banca Nazionale Del Lavoro SPA 2016 EWCA Civ 457 is an interesting