We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 831

A victory for insurers: the YUSUF CEPNIOGLU, April 2016
  • Holman Fenwick Willan LLP
  • Turkey, United Kingdom
  • April 20 2016

Many jurisdictions around the world have legislation granting a victim the right to sue a defendant's insurer directly and without first suing the


“NORDLAKE”“SEAEAGLE” - Collision case leads to rare decision
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • March 30 2016

In a potentially unique English Admiralty case, Mr Justice Teare recently apportioned liability between four vessels involved in the collision


Looking ahead - March 2016
  • DWF LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • March 24 2016

The Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime v Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd & Ors was heard on 21 January. The issue is whether claimants


Congenbill ‘Paramount Clause’ - Hague or Hague Visby Rules?
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • February 29 2016

In Yemgas FZCO & Ors v Superior Pescadores SA 2016 EWCA Civ 101, the Court of Appeal considered whether the standard 'Paramount Clause' wording in


Looking ahead
  • DWF LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • February 25 2016

An update on forthcoming cases, consultations, legislation and key developments, including: New appeals and judgments to watch out for. A new MoJ


Superyacht insurance - the perils of over-valuation
  • Hill Dickinson LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • January 13 2016

Following the total loss by fire of the Riva motoryacht “GALATEA” whilst moored in Athens in late 2011, the English High Court recently held that


Iron Ore Impasse - A failed claim for conversion Sang Stone Hamoon Jonoub Co Ltd -v- Baoyue Shipping Co Ltd 2015 EWCH 288
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • January 5 2016

In the recent case of the "Bao Yue", the English High Court found that the bill of lading holder was liable to reimburse the shipowner for 3 and a


yacht focus - winter 2015
  • Hill Dickinson LLP
  • Asia-Pacific, United Kingdom
  • December 30 2015

The insurers had agreed to insure the yacht against all risks for an ‘agreed value’ of 13 million. The owner had purchased the yacht for 13 million


Supreme Court overturns decision on CMR Article 31
  • Hill Dickinson LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • December 8 2015

Their Lordships have taken a strict approach to the interpretation of the CMR Convention and overturned the Court of Appeal's decision on


Responsibility for loading and discharge under a charterparty bill of lading
  • Hill Dickinson LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • November 19 2015

Société de Distribution de Toutes Merchandises en Côte d'Ivoire & Ors -v- Continental Lines NV & Anr (The 'Sea Miror') 2015 In