We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 584

Contractual interpretation disputes from the Trustee's perspective: The saga continues
  • Bryan Cave LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • June 22 2016

In the first four months of 2016 three more judgments relating to issues of contractual interpretation of provisions contained in documents of

Class X warfare: contractual interpretation of securitisation documents
  • Berwin Leighton Paisner LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • June 22 2016

In a recent video blog we considered how the contractual interpretation principles established in Arnold v Britton may be applied to structured

What next for Interest Rate Hedging Products and mis-selling?
  • Burges Salmon LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • June 15 2016

Businesses which purchased interest rate hedging products (IRHPs) to protect themselves against the threat of interest rate rises are now arguing

Finance and secured lending in the United Kingdom
  • Ashurst LLP
  • European Union, Global, United Kingdom
  • June 15 2016

A structured guide to finance and secured lending in the United Kingdom

Contractual interpretation and penalties in the Financial List
  • DAC Beachcroft
  • United Kingdom
  • May 31 2016

The Financial List has promptly disposed of a case regarding the construction of complex documents in a commercial mortgage-backed securitisation

Financial List signposts tough road for contractual construction
  • RPC
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • May 26 2016

A recent decision in the High Court (Hayfin v Windermere VII CMBS), one of the first from the Financial List, has demonstrated a strict approach to

Structured Finance in the Courts: Five Things We Learned From the Class X Cases
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • United Kingdom
  • May 23 2016

As regular readers of our finance disputes blog will know, April 2016 saw the High Court in London decide no fewer than five cases brought by the

Hayfin Opal Luxco 3 SARL & another v Windermere VII CMBS plc and others 2016 EWHC 782 (Ch)
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • May 13 2016

Here the court considered whether an interest provision was void as a penalty. The issues before the court arose from a commercial mortgage backed

The Class X Factor: It’s a NO from the Chancellor
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • May 11 2016

It's not been a good month for Class X Noteholders. Following the judgment in the Windermere VII case (see our commentary here) in which Snowden J

Financial List signposts a tough road for contractual construction relating to financial traded instruments
  • RPC
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • May 10 2016

In one of the early decisions handed down by the recently established Financial List, Justice Snowden has firmly disposed of a detailed case