We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 661

Supreme Court handed down their judgment in the Edenred case
  • Bond Dickinson LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • July 1 2015

This was a case involving National Savings and Investments (NS&I) which is a non-ministerial Government Department. NS&I offers retail savings and


Administrative Court clarifies law on judicial review time limits under CPR 54.5
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • June 20 2013

The Administrative Court has recently handed down its judgment in R (on the application of Maria Stella Nash) v Barnet London Borough Council & (1


Technology and Construction Court roasts local Council over flawed tender evaluation part 2
  • Maddocks
  • United Kingdom
  • September 9 2015

In July, we published an article on a case in the English Technology and Construction Court regarding a legal challenge to a tender evaluation


Public procurement quarterly update - July to September 2015
  • Bond Dickinson LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • October 30 2015

The Crown Commercial Service (CCS) has published an updated version of its lean sourcing guidance for public sector buyers following the changes to


Planning & CPO - Spring 2015
  • Burges Salmon LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • May 5 2015

With the election looming, the main political parties have published their election manifestos which cover each party’s plans for the planning system


Planning reforms: ideals versus reality
  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • October 31 2011

It is hard to escape the fact that our planning system is in the throes of a dramatic reform, given that these proposed reforms have managed to make front page news and been at the centre of many recent debates during the party conference season


Aggregation of the public interest in non-disclosure under different FOIA exemptions may be permissible
  • Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • April 3 2013

In a recent case involving High Speed Two Limited (HS2), the company responsible for the government's new high-speed rail route between London and


High Court refuses to strike out claim over tender for supplies to the prison service
  • Nabarro LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • May 31 2011

The High Court has largely dismissed the Ministry of Justice’s attempt to strike out claims by an unsuccessful bidder alleging breach of procurement rules in relation to a contract for the supply of frozen food for prisons (in Harry Yearsley Limited v The Secretary of State for Justice


The Supreme Court rules that the public procurement regulations do not prevent public authorities from acquiring shared services from an entity which they jointly control
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • February 25 2011

In Brent LBC and others v Risk Management Partners Ltd, the Supreme Court ruled that local authorities in London did not infringe public procurement law when they purchased insurance services directly from a company which they jointly owned and controlled


Veolia ES Limited v Nottinghamshire County Council
  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • December 3 2010

A recent Court of Appeal decision on the scope of the duty to disclose information under the Audit Commission Act 1998 the "Audit Act") is good news for local authorities