We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 915

English High Court concludes that terms of Luton Airport’s coach concession agreement are an unlawful abuse of its dominant position
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • February 10 2014

Air passengers landing at an airport typically have a range of options for onward travel, including taxi, train or bus. Where available, dedicated

Development in the Green Belt what weighs in the balance?
  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • October 29 2014

In a case decided last week, the Court considered the application of paragraphs 87 and 88 of the NPPF, which relate to development in the Green Belt

Thibodeau v Commissioner of Official Languages of Canada and Air Canada
  • Cooper Grace Ward
  • Canada, United Kingdom
  • October 31 2014

The decision this week of the Supreme Court of Canada in Thibodeau to dismiss the passengers' appeal provides a consistent approach to the earlier

High Court on collision course with EU Commission over Air Cargo Cartel
  • Bryan Cave LLP
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • October 29 2014

In the Air Cargo Cartel proceedings claiming damages against British Airways, the English High Court has ordered the disclosure of the confidential

Van der Lans -v- KLM: Huzar part two?
  • Hill Dickinson LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • December 16 2014

As is now all too familiar to the airline industry, in a landmark ruling, the Court of Appeal in Huzar held that a delayed or cancelled flight 'is

UK airport held to have abused its dominant position with exclusive concessions agreement
  • Bryan Cave LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • February 10 2014

On 28 January, the UK High Court ruled that London Luton Airport Operations Limited (the "Airport") was in a dominant position with regard to its

Out of the extraordinary: the Court of Appeal's judgment in Huzar v Jet2.com
  • DLA Piper LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • June 18 2014

Court of Appeal hands down judgment on the meaning of "extraordinary circumstances" in the case of cancellation or delay arising out of technical

Jet2.com Limited v Huzar and the extraordinary circumstances exception
  • 1 Chancery Lane
  • United Kingdom
  • June 16 2014

There is a phrase in Northern Ireland, where I am from: “as clear as muck”, which is what comes to mind when attempting to fathom the meaning of the

Workplace compliance newsletter (1st quarter 2014)
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • United Kingdom
  • April 3 2014

On March 4, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Lawson v. FMR LLC that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act's (“SOX”) whistleblower protection extends to

Admissibility of AAIB reports in court proceedings
  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • United Kingdom
  • April 15 2014

The recent Court of Appeal case of Hoyle v Rogers upholds the first instance decision that Air Accident Investigation Branch (AAIB) reports are