We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 98

Date of termination of employment is the date the dismissal letter is read
  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • United Kingdom
  • December 2 2010

In Gisda Cyf v Barratt 2010 the Supreme Court upheld the EAT's decision that notification of dismissal sent in a letter by recorded delivery was received by the Claimant when she opened and read the letter, not when it arrived at home


Post-employment victimisation claims
  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • United Kingdom
  • November 6 2012

A claim for victimisation can be brought where an employee has been subjected to a detriment as a result of bringing a discrimination complaint


Pay in lieu of notice did not include guaranteed bonus
  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • United Kingdom
  • January 5 2011

The Court of Appeal in Locke v Candy & Candy Ltd considered whether a clause providing that an employee had to be employed to receive a guaranteed bonus was sufficient to exclude that employee's right to compensation for that bonus when he was summarily dismissed


Post transfer liabilities and the NI fund
  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • United Kingdom
  • October 31 2011

In Pressure Coolers Ltd v Molloy the EAT followed the line of reasoning in OTG v Barke that liabilities in respect of an employee who transfers under TUPE cannot fall to be paid by the Secretary of State out of the National Insurance Fund


Refusing early retirement on the grounds of cost was not age discrimination
  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • United Kingdom
  • April 25 2012

In HM Land Registry v Benson and Others, the EAT held that refusing to give early retirement to employees aged between 50 and 54, on the grounds of cost, was not indirect age discrimination


Redundancy: bumping
  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • United Kingdom
  • April 1 2011

The EAT in Fulcrum Pharma (Europe) Ltd v Bonassera and another considered whether an employee had been unfairly dismissed for redundancy where bumping was not considered as an option


Right to manifest religious belief
  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • April 4 2013

The key issue for the European Court of Human Rights in Eweida and Others v UK was whether a fair balance had been struck between an individual's


When does an employment contract terminate?
  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • United Kingdom
  • May 19 2011

The Court of Appeal has revisited the thorny question of the point at which an employment contract terminates for common law purposes


Minor breach of absence policy
  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • United Kingdom
  • May 19 2011

The EAT in Sakharkar v Northern Foods Grocery Group Ltd ta Fox's biscuits issued a reminder that the larger an organisation is and the better resourced it is, the more closely it will be expected to abide by its own contractual procedures


Entire agreement clauses under scrutiny
  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • United Kingdom
  • May 19 2011

It is common in employment contracts to include an 'entire agreement' clause which provides that the employment contract constitutes the entire understanding between employer and employee in relation to the employment