We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 4,696

Personal Injury - NIHL found to not be a progressive condition
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • September 23 2016

His Honour Judge Wood rejected the Claimant's argument that Noise Induced Hearing Loss (NIHL) is a progressive condition that can deteriorate even


Trainees take on business: the Referendum Series
  • RPC
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • September 23 2016

Never afraid to shy away from the most challenging of topics, in May of this year - with the EU Referendum vote looming - the blog’s Editorial Team


Data exclusivity for innovators - a bridge too far?
  • Taylor Wessing
  • United Kingdom
  • September 22 2016

In R (on the application of Napp Pharmaceuticals Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health acting as the Licensing Authority 2016 EWHC 1982 (Admin


Defining the PCP
  • Serjeants' Inn Chambers
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • September 22 2016

The purpose of defining a ‘provision, criterion or practice’ (“PCP”) is to put the Employment Tribunal in a position to assess whether something an


High Court awards costs against General Dental Council and dentist in PSA appeal
  • Kingsley Napley
  • United Kingdom
  • September 21 2016

Health care professionals subject to disciplinary proceedings will often assume that the final hearing determination will conclude the matter. However


Agency worker may also be end-user's worker for whistleblowing claims
  • Taylor Wessing
  • United Kingdom
  • September 21 2016

Under sections 43A to 43L of the Employment Rights Act 1996, whistleblowers are protected from being subjected to any detriment or dismissal because


Patents Court permits claim for negative declaration and anti-suit injunction to proceed to trial
  • Bristows LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • September 20 2016

This judgment of Arnold J relates to an application made by the Defendants (collectively “AbbVie”) in the context of a wider claim in which the


Corporate Claims Bulletin - September 2016 - Practice and Procedure
  • Eversheds
  • United Kingdom
  • September 19 2016

The claimant had suffered a back injury when attempting to transfer a patient from a trolley. She had claimed damages for personal injury and


Fertility Treatment and Legal Parenthood
  • Freeths
  • United Kingdom
  • September 16 2016

This is the latest in a series of judgments relating to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008. In this case, female civil partners


Court rules on negligent financial advice
  • Cummings Law Ltd
  • United Kingdom
  • September 16 2016

The recent case of O'Hare and another v Coutts & Co 2016 EWHC 2224 (QB) concerned the duty of care when giving financial advice. The court adopted