We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 5,343

Notified Bodies potentially liable to end users of medical devices rules CJEU
  • Taylor Wessing
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • March 28 2017

In October 2016, we reported on Advocate General Sharpston's Opinion in case C 21915 Elisabeth Schmitt v TÜV Rheinland LGS products GmbH concerning


Latest News - March 2017
  • Taylor Wessing
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • March 28 2017

Further to a number of changes to the NICE evaluation procedure, to be introduced in April, drugs that will cost more than


High Court reaffirms that a Registrant’s regulatory history is relevant and admissible at the impairment and sanction stages
  • Kingsley Napley
  • United Kingdom
  • March 27 2017

The Registrant was the subject of proceedings before the NMC’s CCC. The charges against the Registrant arose from incidents that occurred between


‘Successful’ claimant’s costs recovery restricted to 6.7 of budget
  • Hill Dickinson LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • March 27 2017

The Claimant (C) underwent surgery on 11 November 2010. During that surgery C’s spleen was torn or incised but this was not recognised until 36 hours


A question of control
  • Hill Dickinson LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • March 23 2017

In this judgment delivered by the Court of Appeal on 3 March 2017, the Court considered the potential liability of an occupier in relation to persons


High Court provides guidance on the interpretation of "defect" under the Consumer Protection Act 1987
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • March 23 2017

In a landmark judgment on the meaning of "defect" under the Consumer Protection Act 1987 ("the Act"), Mr Justice Hickinbottom in the High Court case


NPA Fights Pharmacy Funding Cuts Due to Disproportionate Effects on Vulnerable
  • Veale Wasbrough Vizards
  • United Kingdom
  • March 22 2017

The National Pharmacy Association (NPA) is challenging the Government's proposed pharmacy funding cuts, in a High Court case. The NPA, which


N -v- ACCG and Ors
  • Hill Dickinson LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • March 22 2017

‘What is the role of the Court of Protection where there is a dispute between the providers or funders of health or social care services for a person


Landmark Supreme Court decision for Hill Dickinson in N -v- ACCG and Ors
  • Hill Dickinson LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • March 22 2017

‘What is the role of the Court of Protection where there is a dispute between the providers or funders of health or social care services for a person


Best interests decision-makers limited to options on the table agrees Supreme Court
  • DAC Beachcroft
  • United Kingdom
  • March 22 2017

The Supreme Court has today published its judgment in the important 'available options' case of N (Appellant) v. ACCG (often referred to as the 'MN'