We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 722

Saudi arbitration law: a change in approach to insurance arbitration
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • July 9 2015

The New Arbitration Law came into force in Saudi Arabia on 9 July 2012 ("New Law"). The New Law, based on the UNCITRAL Model Law on International


Reinsurance update - June 2015
  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • European Union, United Kingdom, USA
  • June 25 2015

The US Case Note highlights a recent decision out of New York addressing whether and when, under New York law, the timeliness of a demand for


General counsel update September 2014
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • Russia, United Kingdom, USA, Australia, China, European Union, Hong Kong
  • September 29 2014

The London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) Court's new rules come into force on 1 October 2014 and are to apply to any arbitration


Shipping Sector Update: Sulamerica CIA Nacional de Seguros SA and others v Enesa Engenharia SA and others 2012 EWCA Civ 638
  • Eversheds LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • February 13 2013

The dispute arose in connection with two construction all risk insurance policies between the appellant Enesa (“Insured”) and the respondent


Court of Appeal rules on the meaning of "claim" and when liability accrues under an indemnity policy
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • September 16 2011

The Court of Appeal has overturned a High Court judgment on the meaning of an arbitration clause and clarified the meaning of "claim" in a public liability policy


International quarterly - issue 13, 2015
  • Fenwick Elliott Solicitors
  • United Kingdom
  • April 14 2015

A party may apply to the English court to remove an arbitrator on the grounds that circumstances exist that give rise to justifiable


Court upholds Arbitrators' decision that 911 World Trade Center attacks are two events
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • February 13 2013

In Aioi Nissan Dowa Insurance Company Limited v Heraldglen Limited and Another 2013 EWHC 154 (Comm), the Commercial Court upheld the decision of an


The London Steamship Owners' Mutual Insurance Assocn v (1) Spain (2) France
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • April 28 2015

Court of Appeal considers whether right of direct action against an insurer under foreign law was subject to the terms of the insurance policy


Court considers reinsurance contacts covering September 11 losses
  • Vedder Price PC
  • United Kingdom
  • April 24 2013

The case arose from a tribunal award relating to reinsurance contracts covering losses arising out of the terrorist attack on the World Trade Centre


Insurance and reinsurance: construing inconsistent arbitration and jurisdiction clauses
  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • United Kingdom
  • November 12 2013

In the recent decision of British American Insurance (Kenya) Ltd v Matelec Sal and Thika Power Ltd the English court has ruled English law and London