We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 54

Pros and cons of common ADR processes
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • October 2 2012

We set out in this document a short discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of some of the most common dispute resolution processes under the


ICC to revise ADR, Expert Determination and Dispute Board Rules
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • November 8 2012

Earlier this year, the ICC Commission on Arbitration set up a Consultative Task Force comprising experts in the field of international ADR to review and revise their ADR Rules, Rules for Expertise and Dispute Board Rules


Clear wording is needed to constitute a submission to the jurisdiction of an adjudicator to resolve a dispute
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • October 8 2012

In Clarke v JMD 2012 EWHC 2627 (TCC) the court found that the parties had not entered into an ad hoc adjudication, contrary to the adjudicator’s finding


ADR legal developments
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • February 25 2010

The final report in Lord Justice Jackson's year-long costs review was published on 14 January 2010


High Court declines to impose costs sanctions for refusal to mediate
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • November 2 2012

In a recent decision, the High Court held that a successful defendant was not unreasonable to refuse mediation and should not be penalised in costs on that basis: ADS Aerospace Limited v EMS Global Tracking Limited 2012 EWHC 2904 (TCC


English High Court defends successful party’s refusal to mediate and declines to impose costs sanctions
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • November 1 2012

In ADS Aerospace Limited v EMS Global Tracking Limited 2012 EWHC 2904 (TCC), Mr Justice Akenhead sitting in the Technology and Construction Courtheld that a successful party was not unreasonable to refuse mediation and should not be penalised in costs on that basis


Alternative dispute resolution e-bulletin
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • January 17 2012

Welcome to our first ADR e-bulletin of 2012


Court rules that mediation and adjudication can run concurrently
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • February 25 2010

In Ericsson AB v EADS Defence & Security Systems Ltd 2009 EWHC 2598 (TCC) the court ruled that express wording was needed if parties wanted to make types of dispute resolution mutually exclusive


Lord Justice Jackson's review of civil litigation costs - views on ADR
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • February 25 2010

The final report in Lord Justice Jackson's year-long costs review was published on 14 January 2010


Automatic referral to mediation introduced in UK County Court Money Claims Centre from 1 October 2012
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • October 4 2012

The 59th Update to the Civil Procedure Rules came into force on 1 October 2012