We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 54

Parties reach settlement in long-running Wembley litigation
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • September 22 2010

This summer, the dispute between Brookfield Construction (formerly Multiplex Construction) and Mott MacDonald (2010 EWHC 659 (TCC)) finally settled


Pros and cons of common ADR processes
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • October 2 2012

We set out in this document a short discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of some of the most common dispute resolution processes under the


Automatic referral to mediation introduced in UK County Court Money Claims Centre from 1 October 2012
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • October 4 2012

The 59th Update to the Civil Procedure Rules came into force on 1 October 2012


ADR legal developments
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • February 25 2010

The final report in Lord Justice Jackson's year-long costs review was published on 14 January 2010


Formal mediation scheme launched in relation to family proceedings
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • June 21 2010

Further to a pilot in 2009, a practice direction came into force in April 2010 that empowers civil courts hearing family law disputes to attempt to resolve appropriate cases through mediation


Court rules that mediation and adjudication can run concurrently
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • February 25 2010

In Ericsson AB v EADS Defence & Security Systems Ltd 2009 EWHC 2598 (TCC) the court ruled that express wording was needed if parties wanted to make types of dispute resolution mutually exclusive


UK: further case on enforcement and severability of adjudicator’s decision
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • November 16 2012

In its third judgment on severability in 2012 (see earlier cases Working Environments Ltd v Greencoat Construction 2012 EWHC 1039 and Beck v UK Flooring 2012 EWHC 1808 (TCC)) the English High Court has ruled that an adjudicator’s decision can be enforced in part only, severing the part reached without jurisdiction


Clear wording is needed to constitute a submission to the jurisdiction of an adjudicator to resolve a dispute
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • October 8 2012

In Clarke v JMD 2012 EWHC 2627 (TCC) the court found that the parties had not entered into an ad hoc adjudication, contrary to the adjudicator’s finding


Alternative dispute resolution e-bulletin
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • January 17 2012

Welcome to our first ADR e-bulletin of 2012


Recent litigation developments
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • May 1 2012

On 24 April the government published its anticipated consultation on competition law private actions, including radical proposals for a new "opt-out" collective action for competition claims on behalf of both consumers and businesses in the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT