We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 54

Pros and cons of common ADR processes
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • October 2 2012

We set out in this document a short discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of some of the most common dispute resolution processes under the


Unilateral jurisdiction clauses may not always be effective
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • November 13 2012

It is not uncommon, particularly in a finance context, for an agreement to give a wider choice to some parties than others to decide where disputes will be resolved


Alternative dispute resolution e-bulletin
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • January 17 2012

Welcome to our first ADR e-bulletin of 2012


Court of Appeal rules that expert has no jurisdiction in Barclays Bank Plc v Nylon Capital LLP 2011 EWCA CIV 826
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • September 6 2011

In this case, the Court of Appeal considered whether there should be a stay of court proceedings pending expert determination under an agreement between the parties


Coalition government announces plans to promote greater recourse to ADR
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • January 31 2011

The UK coalition government has publicly committed to a greater use of mediation and other forms of ADR in the civil justice system (see the Ministry of Justice website for more details


Parties reach settlement in long-running Wembley litigation
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • September 22 2010

This summer, the dispute between Brookfield Construction (formerly Multiplex Construction) and Mott MacDonald (2010 EWHC 659 (TCC)) finally settled


Parties cannot avoid Commercial Agents Regulations by choice of non-EU law and arbitration
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • January 29 2010

In Accentuate v Asigra 2009 EWHC 2655 (QB) the English High Court held it had jurisdiction to hear a claim for compensation under the Commercial Agents (Council Directive) Regulations 1993, even though the relevant agreement was subject to a choice of Canadian law and arbitration and the Canadian arbitral tribunal had already ruled against the claim


ACAS reports increase in use of mediation
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • September 22 2010

The Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS) published its annual report on 26 July 2010


ADR legal developments
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • February 25 2010

The final report in Lord Justice Jackson's year-long costs review was published on 14 January 2010


Ministry of Justice consultation on promoting greater recourse to ADR
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • June 8 2011

In our first ADR e-bulletin of this year we reported that the UK government had publicly committed to a greater use of mediation and other forms of ADR in the civil justice system