We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 285

Investors need to be clear as to the basis upon which an investment is made
  • Nabarro LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • April 23 2009

Recent decisions from the English Court confirm that investors need to be clear at the outset of a transaction as to the precise legal basis upon which they are making an investment


Supreme Court: discrimination against part-time workers
  • Nabarro LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • February 26 2013

The Supreme Court has decided that part-time fee-paid judges are "workers" protected by the Part Time Workers Directive, as their relationship with


UK competition reforms to create new “opt-out” class actions and encourage private actions for damages
  • Nabarro LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • February 7 2013

Government proposals relating to private actions for competition damages will make it easier to bring actions in the UK and will introduce class


Brownfield land and beating the Blue Billy blues
  • Nabarro LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • September 30 2008

Developers and funders are frequently involved in the purchase of contaminated sites and the location and potential value of these sites often makes them attractive targets for such investment


Regus (UK) Limited v Epcot Solutions Limited and Socimer International Bank Ltd v Standard Bank London Ltd
  • Nabarro LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • July 21 2008

The Court of Appeal has recently provided guidance on the extent to which suppliers may limit liability under service contracts


High Court reinforces need for amendments to be made in accordance with scheme rules
  • Nabarro LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • August 31 2007

In Sovereign Trustees Ltd v Glover the High Court has emphasised the need to comply with the scheme’s power of amendment in order for amendments to be valid


Brent ordered to pay damages for breach of the procurement rules
  • Nabarro LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • June 6 2008

On 16 May 2008, the High Court ruled that the London Borough of Brent (Brent) is required to pay damages to Risk Management Partners Limited (Risk) for breach of the Public Contract Regulations 2006


BBC found not to have breached competition law
  • Nabarro LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • June 6 2008

On 20 May, 2008, the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) upheld the decision of the Office of Communications (Ofcom) that an agreement between BBC Broadcast Limited (BBCB) and Channel 4 for the provision of television access services did not infringe either the Competition Act 1998 or EC competition law


Cartel extradition appeal dismissed by the High Court
  • Nabarro LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • February 5 2007

Mr Ian Norris, the former Chief Executive of Morgan Crucible appealed against both the decision of an English District Court (that allegations of participation in price fixing constituted an extradition offence) and the Secretary of State’s decision to extradite


Financial Ombudsman Service: claimants allowed to seek further damages in court
  • Nabarro LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • January 30 2013

The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) can award compensation up to a maximum of £150,000. Once an award has been made, the claimant can decide