We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 286

(Un)lawful terminations, religion discrimination and holiday rights of healthy workers
  • Nabarro LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • January 29 2013

A number of judgments, published in the last few weeks, are likely to affect the day-to-day working practices of many of our readers. They cover a


High Court lifts automatic suspension in the Indigo case
  • Nabarro LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • January 5 2011

On 1 December 2010, the High Court was asked to rule on the first application to lift an automatic suspension of entry into a contract under the provisions of the new remedies provisions in the Public Contracts Regulations 2006


Standard & Poor’s held liable for investor’s loss in Australia
  • Nabarro LLP
  • Australia, United Kingdom
  • March 7 2013

On 5 November 2012 judgment was given by the Federal Court of Australia in favour of 12 local councils, who sought to recover losses suffered after


Advocate-General advises on UK default retirement age
  • Nabarro LLP
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • September 30 2008

The Advocate-General has issued his opinion in the Heyday case which challenges the "default" retirement age in the Age Discrimination Regulations allowing employers to retire employees from age 65 subject to certain procedural safeguards


Input tax recovery: BAA fails to take off in the Court of Appeal
  • Nabarro LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • March 5 2013

In the Court of Appeal: BAA Ltd has lost its battle to recover £6.7m of input tax incurred by a special purchase vehicle (SPV), during the course of


Investors need to be clear as to the basis upon which an investment is made
  • Nabarro LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • April 23 2009

Recent decisions from the English Court confirm that investors need to be clear at the outset of a transaction as to the precise legal basis upon which they are making an investment


Supreme Court: discrimination against part-time workers
  • Nabarro LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • February 26 2013

The Supreme Court has decided that part-time fee-paid judges are "workers" protected by the Part Time Workers Directive, as their relationship with


LPP: naked self interest replaced by functionality?
  • Nabarro LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • January 29 2013

In a landmark decision involving the great and the good of the legal world, the Supreme Court has confirmed that legal professional privilege (LPP


QuarterDay
  • Nabarro LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • December 25 2012

A landlord can oppose renewal of a business tenancy protected by the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (the Act) if it intends to occupy the premises


High Court rules FOS decisions may not be “final and binding”
  • Nabarro LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • January 8 2013

The High Court has held that investors who accept a decision of the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) can still go to court to recover damages in