We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 124

High Court grants another order requiring ISPs to block websites infringing trade marks
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • United Kingdom
  • August 31 2016

In the recent case of Cartier and Another v British Telecommunications and Others 2016 EWHC 339 (Ch) ("Cartier II"), HHJ Hacon handed down


Court of Appeal says Cartier decision "entirely correct" - but what about costs?
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • United Kingdom
  • July 6 2016

The Court of Appeal has held that Arnold J was "entirely correct" in his decision to grant orders to force the five main internet service providers


Myth 10: Vendor has and should accept unlimited liability for data security breaches
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • United Kingdom
  • July 1 2016

Fact is that service providers may not always be able to limit their liability vis-à-vis the data subjects in scenarios where they contract with


Mi-Space (UK) Ltd v. Bridgwater Civil Engineering Ltd
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • United Kingdom
  • April 8 2016

The High Court of England and Wales has confirmed that email communications can constitute a binding agreement under English law, in another example


Court Orders Blocking of Piracy Site Under New Site-blocking Framework
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • United Kingdom
  • February 29 2016

On 11 February, 2016 the High Court ordered Network Service Providers ("NSP") Singtel, Starhub, M1, MyRepublic and ViewQuest to block piracy site


CJEU rules that the US Safe Harbor Program is invalid
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • November 19 2015

The Court of Justice of the European Union ("CJEU"), following the opinion of the Advocate General, invalidated European Commission Decision 2000520


Site blocking commences in Australia
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • Australia, United Kingdom
  • July 1 2015

As of 27 June 2015, the Copyright Amendment (Online Infringement) Act 2015 (Act) has passed both houses of the Australian Parliament and commenced


UK High Court makes further orders under s.97A CDPA and CJEU issues ruling in UPC Telekabel regarding proportionality of orders
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • July 25 2014

In a decision of 18 February this year, but only reported recently, Henderson J granted further site-blocking orders under s.97A CDPA. Several major


CJEU issues ruling on internet browsing technology in the Meltwater case
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • June 5 2014

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) today issued its decision in the Meltwater Case C-36013, a long-running (5 year) dispute between


High Court awards "headline" damages against Times Newspapers for failure to remove defamatory material from website
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • United Kingdom
  • May 27 2014

A recent High Court case, in which Times Newspapers Ltd ("TNL") was ordered to pay a claimant £60,000 in damages in respect of a defamatory story