We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 103

Frustration
  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • United Kingdom
  • December 2 2010

Frustration of contracts is rare


Right to manifest religious belief
  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • April 4 2013

The key issue for the European Court of Human Rights in Eweida and Others v UK was whether a fair balance had been struck between an individual's


Post-employment victimisation claims
  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • United Kingdom
  • November 6 2012

A claim for victimisation can be brought where an employee has been subjected to a detriment as a result of bringing a discrimination complaint


Meaning of ‘organised grouping of employees' under TUPE
  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • United Kingdom
  • July 26 2012

In Seawell Ltd v Ceva Freight (UK) Ltd, the Scottish EAT again considered the meaning of ‘an organised grouping of employees’ in the context of service provision changes under TUPE, and followed the approach set out in Argyll Coastal Services Ltd v Stirling


Supreme Court looks at indirect age discrimination
  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • United Kingdom
  • June 30 2012

Mr Homer retired from the police at age 51, and began work for the Police National Legal Database (PNLD) as a legal adviser


Joint and several liability in discrimination claims
  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • United Kingdom
  • November 28 2011

The EAT has highlighted the potential personal exposure for individuals in discrimination claims


Adjustments: further EAT guidance
  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • United Kingdom
  • November 28 2011

Further clarification on what constitutes an adjustment for the purposes of the Disability Discrimination Act was provided by the EAT in Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust v Foster


Reasonable adjustments: EAT guidance
  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • United Kingdom
  • November 28 2011

In Salford NHS Primary Care Trust v Smith the EAT decided that it was not a reasonable adjustment for the purposes of the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA, now enshrined in the Equality Act) to propose a career break to an employee who was on long term sick leave


References: outstanding allegations
  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • United Kingdom
  • November 28 2011

The Court of Appeal in Jackson v Liverpool City Council considered a claim for damages against the Council when it provided a reference which encompassed concerns about Mr Jackson’s work which had come to light after the termination of his employment


Rise in part time workers and age discrimination claims
  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • United Kingdom
  • November 28 2011

The ET and EAT 20102011 statistics have been published, showing a threefold increase in part time workers’ claims and a 32 increase in claims for age discrimination