We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 2,026

Productivity Commission recommends extensive changes to Australia’s intellectual property laws
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia
  • April 29 2016

On 29 April 2016, the Productivity Commission released its draft report on its inquiry into Australia's intellectual property arrangements. The


Use of competitors’ trade marks in Google AdWords keywords and sponsored links - foul or fair?
  • Kliger Partners
  • Australia
  • April 28 2016

When using the Google AdWords advertising service, can a business legally use its competitors' trade marks as keywords and in the headings of


Latest News on Australian Border Counterfeit Detection
  • Watermark Patent & Trade Marks Attorneys
  • Australia
  • April 26 2016

For trade mark owners concerned by counterfeit goods being imported into Australia, an option exists to record a Notice of Objection with the


Surprising trade mark registration granted for purple and orange colours
  • Davies Collison Cave
  • Australia
  • April 26 2016

Discount Drugstores Pty Ltd succeeded in an appeal to the Federal Court of Australia in relation to the registrability of the colours Purple and


Protecting the MICRO
  • Spruson & Ferguson
  • Australia
  • April 18 2016

Schulke & Mayr opposed the registration of the trade mark MICROGUARD filed by Ecolab USA on the basis of its prior use (section 60) and registration


It is no joke
  • Spruson & Ferguson
  • Australia
  • April 18 2016

Smartchannel opposed the registration of the trade mark GENTRAX by Zhicheng Cheng in relation to generators in Class 7. The opposition was based on


No extension, but submit it anyway
  • Spruson & Ferguson
  • Australia
  • April 18 2016

This matter concerned an application to extend the deadline for the opponent to file evidence-in-reply in relation to its opposition to registration


“Microshield” and “Microguard” are visually and aurally distinct?
  • Williams + Hughes
  • Australia
  • April 18 2016

Ecolab USA Inc. (“the Applicant”) applied for registration of the trade mark MICROGUARD (“the opposed mark”) in relation to various skin care


Wait, where is the hotel?!
  • Spruson & Ferguson
  • Australia
  • April 18 2016

This matter concerned the application by Marriott Worldwide to register its trade mark FAIRFIELD in relation to business services (Class 35) and


Yes, but still no
  • Spruson & Ferguson
  • Australia
  • April 18 2016

K-Tec opposed the registration of the below mark in the name of Healthy Foods covering electric food processors in Class 7