We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 1,499

Injunctions and undertakings in pharma patent fights: the cost of doing business?
  • Clayton Utz
  • Australia
  • June 9 2016

When a pharma patentee obtains interlocutory injunctive relief and gives the "usual undertaking as to damages" to the Court but is unsuccessful at


FOXTEL vs BBC - APO finds scheduled download system patentable
  • FB Rice
  • Australia
  • June 9 2016

The Australian Patent Office (APO) recently issued its first patentable subject matter decision post-RPL, being FOXTEL Management Pty Ltd v British


Apportioning for the Standard When Valuing Standards-Essential Patents
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • Australia, USA
  • June 8 2016

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), a national research organization of Australia, recently filed a petition for


Allowability of amendments following a “successful” pre-grant patent opposition
  • Shelston IP Pty Ltd
  • Australia
  • June 7 2016

Pre-grant patent oppositions in Australia enable interested parties to oppose the grant of a patent application once the Patent Office has completed


How an object statement can bring down your patent
  • Freehills Patent Attorneys
  • Australia
  • May 31 2016

An Australian Court has just ruled that for a given patent claim to be valid, every promise about the invention in the specification must be


Patentability of Genetic Material - Australian Rules
  • GQ Life Sciences
  • Australia, USA
  • May 25 2016

After the United States Supreme Court ruling in the Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics in June of 2013, the industry scurried


What man dost thou dig it for? - Mine drilling technique patent found to be invalid
  • The Commercial Bar Association of Victoria
  • Australia
  • May 24 2016

Jessup J held that all the claims of Sandvik’s patent in issue in the proceeding (not all claims were in issue) were invalid by reason of the patent


Protection of Intellectual Property During Commercialisation
  • McCabes
  • Australia
  • May 24 2016

Rights in intellectual property are central to the generation of income from a newly developed invention. However, forming business relationships to


Australia’s War on Business Method Patents: Advice for Concerned Patentees
  • Shelston IP Pty Ltd
  • Australia
  • May 24 2016

As recently noted, the High Court has declined to change the direction of the debate over patentability of computer implemented technologies in


Better to curse the darkness - infringement of street lighting assembly patent upheld
  • The Commercial Bar Association of Victoria
  • Australia
  • May 24 2016

In the principal proceedings, the respondent (Streetworx) was successful in its infringement claims against the first appellant (AUG) and its director