We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 11-20 of 1,576

Contributing to a patent claim might not make you a co-inventor
  • FPA Patent Attorneys
  • Australia
  • October 14 2016

A decision by the Full Federal Court of Australia has found that even if you have contributed to an invention and your contribution has led to a

IPR Evidence and Trial Impact for Practitioners
  • Baker Botts LLP
  • Australia, Global, USA
  • October 4 2016

Although initially pegged as sounding the death knell for the majority of challenged patent claims, over the past couple of years, the Patent Trial

Patent extension of term available for second indications for pharmaceutical substances produced with recombinant DNA
  • Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick
  • Australia
  • September 27 2016

The Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) has overturned a decision of the Commissioner of Patents and found that Swiss-style claims can form the

Australian Patent Office overruled - Swiss-style claims can confer eligibility for patent term extensions
  • Shelston IP Pty Ltd
  • Australia
  • September 22 2016

As previously reported, the Australian Patent Office issued two decisions in August 2015 in which it found that Swiss-style claims (which are of the

3 Rounds to Lucas Mill in Chinese Patent Case
  • FPA Patent Attorneys
  • Australia, China
  • September 21 2016

In 2014 Lucas Mill discovered a knockoff of its Patented portable sawmill being sold online and took immediate action for infringement of its Chinese

Unfulfilled promises - potentially fatal to patent validity
  • Davies Collison Cave
  • Australia
  • September 16 2016

While some politicians seem to get away with making sometimes promises during an election campaign, with little prospect of fulfilling them all

Full court decision potentially limits definition of ‘comprises’
  • Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick
  • Australia
  • September 15 2016

The Full Court decision in Actavis Pty Ltd v Orion Corporation 2016 FCAFC 121 potentially limits the effectiveness of a definition of “comprises”

AIPPI Standing Committee Report
  • Davies Collison Cave
  • Australia
  • September 14 2016

A report by the AIPPI Standing Committee on information technology and Internet on the current situation around the world on the protection of

Extension of term on 'Swiss-style' pharmaceutical claims
  • FB Rice
  • Australia
  • September 12 2016

In August 2015, we reported on a decision of the Australian Patent Office dealing with three applications by Abbvie Biotechnology for extensions of

Revisiting exclusivity: Is your patent licence up to scratch?
  • Clayton Utz
  • Australia
  • September 12 2016

On 9 September 2016 the Full Federal Court of Australia delivered judgment in Actavis Pty Ltd v Orion Corporation 2016 FCAFC 121. The Full Court