We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,354

12 signposts to stop your computer implemented inventions from going down the bad road of Non-Patentable Subject Matter in Australia
  • Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick
  • Australia
  • February 10 2016

The Australian Patent Office has updated their Patent Manual of Practice and Procedure on 1 February 2016 to include the following signposts to

Clarification on softwarebusiness method patents
  • Shelston IP Pty Ltd
  • Australia
  • February 8 2016

The Australian Appeal Court has recently clarified the position of software and business method patents in Australia. In Commissioner of Patents v RPL

Computer implemented inventions - IP Australia provides guidelines for patentability
  • AJ Park
  • Australia
  • February 5 2016

Late last year we reported on a decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia that affects the patentability of computer implemented

Patent Term Extensions in Japan - Supreme Court revises JPO examination practice
  • Watermark Patent & Trade Marks Attorneys
  • Australia, Japan
  • February 3 2016

Patent laws in some, but not all, jurisdictions allow the extension of the term of a patent (normally 20 years) for a pharmaceutical substance. Such

Much ado about "said"
  • Minter Ellison
  • Australia
  • January 28 2016

The scope of legal protection provided by a patent boils down to the interpretation of the claims. The drafting of claims has certain elements of art

Business Method and Software Patent Eligibility: Australian and U.S. Standards
  • Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
  • Australia, USA
  • January 28 2016

This is the first of a two-part series comparing Australian and U.S. law and will focus on software and computer-related inventions. While U.S

Commonwealth’s damages claim for overpaying on patented products continues
  • Shelston IP Pty Ltd
  • Australia
  • January 24 2016

The Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia has rejected an argument that the Commonwealth is precluded by provisions of the Therapeutic Goods

How high has the bar been raised? The Australian Patent Office issues its first opposition decision on a post ‘Raising the Bar’ patent application
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • Australia
  • January 21 2016

In the first opposition decision of the Australian Patent Office to apply the post-‘Raising the Bar’ disclosure and support requirements, the Hearing

Ingenuity central to patentability of computer-implemented business method claims
  • Spruson & Ferguson
  • Australia
  • January 21 2016

The Full Federal Court ("Full Court") handed down a much-anticipated decision in the appeal by the Commissioner for Patents of Commissioner of

Look before you leap: seeking to enforce your pharmaceutical patent may lead to unintended consequences
  • Freehills Patent Attorneys
  • Australia, United Kingdom, USA
  • January 11 2016

It may not be just generic manufacturers seeking compensation when their product launch is found to be delayed by an originator wielding what is