We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 98

3D Printing and intellectual property: strategies to meet the challenge
  • Watermark Patent & Trade Marks Attorneys
  • Australia
  • May 31 2016

3D printing poses a challenge to manufacturers by providing a means by which products or spare parts can be easily manufactured by competitors or


Monash University licenses 3D printed anatomy series to German company, Erler Zimmer GmbH
  • Watermark Patent & Trade Marks Attorneys
  • Australia
  • May 29 2015

The 3D Printed Anatomy Series developed by Monash University is now available for sale. The kit first received wide-spread attention in mid-2014


Embracing disruptive technology
  • Watermark Patent & Trade Marks Attorneys
  • Australia
  • June 15 2015

We readily embrace disruptive Technologies because they bring benefits of greater work efficiency, product variety, ease of manufacture, convenience


3D printing and intellectual property: a new challenge for IP owners
  • Watermark Patent & Trade Marks Attorneys
  • Australia
  • October 13 2015

3D printing raises a number of issues for intellectual property (IP) owners already facing the challenges of the internet and other digital


Officeworks to commence inhouse 3D printing service
  • Watermark Patent & Trade Marks Attorneys
  • Australia
  • May 13 2015

Officeworks, one of Australia's largest office supply store chains, will commence an in-house 3D printing service on 15 June 2015. The '3D Experience


US Trade Representative rates Trading Partners on IP Rights - the 2013 Special 301 Report
  • Watermark Patent & Trade Marks Attorneys
  • Australia, Global, USA
  • May 6 2013

The 2013 Special 301 Report has just issued. The US Trade Representative (USTR) at least annually rates the IP performance of US trading partners to


Journal 2015 April to June for overseas readers
  • Watermark Patent & Trade Marks Attorneys
  • Australia, India
  • July 8 2015

A recent decision of the Federal Court of Australia has considered the meaning of “control” in the context of trade mark licensing. Historical


The commercial impact of a changing legal landscape in Australia
  • Watermark Patent & Trade Marks Attorneys
  • Australia
  • January 28 2009

In a business environment in which intangible assets continue to represent an ever-increasing proportion of the value of a corporation, actively managing these assets in the boardroom is becoming a key duty of directors


Australia’s Productivity Commission releases Draft Report on Intellectual Property Arrangements
  • Watermark Patent & Trade Marks Attorneys
  • Australia
  • April 29 2016

The Draft Report was released on 29 April 2016 and makes some firm recommendations including the following


The probably invalid patent: is clearing the way a necessary strategy?
  • Watermark Patent & Trade Marks Attorneys
  • Australia
  • February 17 2010

Occasionally a question arises regarding the proposed exploitation of a patent that is considered to be invalid