We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 604

Transcripts of oral leniency statements should be disclosed
  • De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
  • Netherlands
  • January 13 2016

Oral leniency statements do not enjoy the intended protection against disclosure. The highest Dutch administrative appeal court recently ruled that


Follow-on kartelschadeclaims: nederland blijft populaire jurisdictie
  • Maverick Advocaten NV
  • Netherlands
  • June 4 2015

Al geruime tijd wordt Nederland binnen Europa beschouwd als één van de populairste jurisdicties voor het aanhangig maken van


Follow-on cartel damages claims: the Netherlands still a popular jurisdiction
  • Maverick Advocaten NV
  • European Union, Netherlands
  • June 5 2015

For quite some time, the Netherlands has been considered one of the most popular jurisdictions in Europe for bringing (follow-on) cartel damages


De Raad van State verduidelijkt de positie van de concurrent-aanvragers bij subsidieverdeling
  • Stibbe
  • Netherlands
  • July 15 2015

Vandaag heeft de Afdeling bestuursrechtspraak van de Raad van State (‘de Afdeling’) een belangrijke uitspraak gedaan over de positie van de


Dutch Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal ruled that the ACM can use evidence obtained through wiretaps by other Government agencies
  • Stibbe
  • Netherlands
  • August 4 2015

On 9 July 2015, the Dutch Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal ("CBb") ruled that the ACM can rely on evidence obtained through wiretaps by other


Dutch courts accepted jurisdiction on the basis of Dutch anchor defendants in two antitrust damages cases
  • Stibbe
  • Netherlands
  • August 4 2015

On 21 and 22 July 2015 respectively, two Dutch courts assumed jurisdiction in antitrust damages cases on the basis of Dutch "anchor defendants". The


ACM further regulates the railway sector
  • Maverick Advocaten NV
  • European Union, Netherlands
  • October 29 2015

There has been regular media coverage of the railway sector this past year. The Dutch Railways ("NS") in particular frequently dominated the


Dutch Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal ruled that national courts should apply the same standard of review to Phase-I and Phase-II merger decisions
  • Stibbe
  • Netherlands
  • November 2 2015

On 6 October 2015, the Dutch Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal ("CBb") fully upheld an earlier ruling by the District Court of Rotterdam


The possibility of an unfavourable precedent is not a sufficient substantial interest to join legal proceedings between other parties
  • Stibbe
  • Netherlands
  • November 25 2015

In its judgment dated 12 June 2015, the Dutch Supreme Court decided in the matter between TenneT and ABB that the potential precedent effect of a


Air cargo cartel damages litigation: determining jurisdiction for follow-on damages claim
  • De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
  • Netherlands
  • October 21 2015

Dispute Resolution analysis: in July 2015 the Amsterdam District Court concluded that there had been no abuse of procedural law by KLM in a case