We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 596

Balanced, pragmatic and fast: the Netherlands remains an attractive jurisdiction for follow-on cartel damage claims
  • Maverick Advocaten NV
  • European Union, Netherlands
  • April 24 2014

For several years the Netherlands has been amongst the most important jurisdictions in the European Union for cartel damage claims. Recent judgments


How the cookie crumbled court upholds blocked bakery merger
  • De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
  • Netherlands
  • April 24 2014

The Rotterdam District Court has upheld a Dutch Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) decision to prohibit a transaction between two rival baking companies due to a high combined market share on the Dutch rusk market


Commissie is helder: wanneer sprake is van een mededingingsbeperkend doel geldt geen veilige haven
  • Bird & Bird
  • Netherlands
  • July 2 2014

Op basis van vaste jurisprudentie van het Hof van Justitie vallen mededingingsbeperkende afspraken niet onder het kartelverbod, wanneer de afspraak


Fast and precise: Dutch courts in cartel damages proceedings
  • De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
  • Netherlands
  • December 12 2013

The Netherlands appears to be an attractive jurisdiction for cartel damages proceedings for both cartel victims and cartel members. In two recent


The Netherlands: an attractive jurisdiction for follow-on cartel damage claims
  • Maverick Advocaten NV
  • European Union, Netherlands
  • April 24 2014

For several years the Netherlands has been amongst the most important jurisdictions in the European Union for cartel damage claims. Courts dealing


Vertically integrated companies may face higher cartel fine
  • De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
  • European Union, Netherlands
  • June 11 2014

Captive sales should be included in the turnover figure used as a basis for calculating cartel fines. Advocate General Wathelet stated this in a


First substantive ruling on cartel damages
  • De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
  • Netherlands
  • April 25 2013

The District Court East Netherlands has ruled that ABB must compensate TenneT, the operator of the Dutch electricity grid, for the damages it


Silence is golden: ex-employees don't have to snitch on former employers
  • De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
  • Netherlands
  • April 25 2013

The Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal has resolved a long-lasting dispute on the scope of a company's right to remain silent. It ruled that


Under a pre-Expedia instruction of the Dutch Supreme Court, the Arnhem Appeals Court applies the appreciability test to an object infringement
  • Stibbe
  • Netherlands
  • May 2 2013

On 26 March 2013, the Arnhem Appeals Court rendered its judgment in the Batavus case (LJN: BZ5188) , following remand instructions from the Dutch


Court of Appeal Amsterdam rules that duty imposed on members of trade association to purchase software violates competition law
  • Stibbe
  • Netherlands
  • August 2 2012

The Court of Appeal Amsterdam handed down an interesting judgment (LJN: BX0460) in a civil case in which it ruled that an obligation imposed on the members of a trade association to exclusively purchase certain software violates article 6 of the Dutch Competition Act (the equivalent of article 101 of the TFEU