We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 724

ACM’s decision in the AstraZeneca case: from cartel paradise to monopoly paradise?
  • Maverick Advocaten NV
  • Netherlands
  • January 5 2015

ACM recently announced that after four years it has closed its investigation into possible abuse of a dominant position by AstraZeneca. The


Is the ACM finally going to tackle abuse of a dominant position?
  • Maverick Advocaten NV
  • European Union, Netherlands
  • July 10 2014

In a case that has drawn much attention, the EU's General Court recently confirmed the fine of more than 1 billion that the European Commission


Amsterdam District Court ruled that EU Commission is best placed to decide on disclosure of its cartel decisions
  • Stibbe
  • Netherlands
  • April 1 2015

In a judgment of 27 March 2015, the District Court of Amsterdam ("District Court") dismissed claims from claim vehicle Equilib that certain


Limburg District Court accepted jurisdiction in damages claim against immunity applicants
  • Stibbe
  • Netherlands
  • April 1 2015

On 25 February 2015, the District Court of Limburg ("District Court") rendered a judgment on various preliminary issues in an antitrust damage case


Doing business in India
  • Nishith Desai Associates
  • Canada, Germany, India, Japan, Mauritius, Netherlands, Singapore, Switzerland, United Kingdom, USA
  • April 30 2015

India is the seventh largest country by area and the second-most populous country in the world. It has a large and growing middle-class with an


District Court of Rotterdam rejected assertion that Port of Rotterdam Authority has a dominant position
  • Stibbe
  • Netherlands
  • October 6 2014

On 24 September 2014, the District Court of Rotterdam dismissed claims by Europe Container Terminals ("ECT") that the Port of Rotterdam Authority


Amsterdam Court rejected request for preliminary witness hearings in the Air Cargo antitrust litigation case
  • Stibbe
  • Netherlands
  • October 6 2014

On 25 September 2014, the Amsterdam District Court rejected a request by the claims vehicle Stichting Cartel Compensation ("SCC") to hold preliminary


Dutch Court of Appeal confirmed availability of passing-on defence under Dutch law
  • Stibbe
  • Netherlands
  • October 6 2014

A hotly debated topic with regard to antitrust damage claims is whether defendants can rely on the passing-on defence. That is, defendants have sought


Nederland - jurisprudentie
  • De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
  • Netherlands
  • February 25 2014

Gerechtshof Amsterdam 4 februari 2014, Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V e.a. Lufthansa Cargo AG e.a. (zaak 200.114.133


Court issues first substantive ruling on cartel damages
  • De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
  • Netherlands
  • May 23 2013

The East Netherlands District Court has ruled that ABB must compensate Dutch electricity grid operator TenneT for damages that it suffered as a