We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 704

Non-compete and the cartel prohibition: high evidentiary standards apply
  • Maverick Advocaten NV
  • European Union, Netherlands
  • May 14 2014

Companies that enter into transactions or work together sometimes agree not to compete with each other, for instance when a company is sold and the


EU & competition law review 14 May 2014
  • Roschier
  • European Union, Finland, Netherlands
  • May 14 2014

On 8 May 2014, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) handed down a judgment dismissing the appeal by Bolloré against a judgment of the


Dutch appeals court ruled that tree nurseries cartel did not have an effect on trade between EU Member States
  • Stibbe
  • Netherlands
  • May 2 2014

On 10 April 2014, the Administrative High Court for Trade and Industry (College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven, "CBB") rendered two judgments


District court annuls fining decision against insulated glass producers because of unreliable leniency statements
  • Stibbe
  • Netherlands
  • May 2 2014

On 3 April 2014, the District Court of Rotterdam issued a judgment in a case regarding an alleged cartel of producers of insulated glass units. The


How the cookie crumbled: court upholds blocked bakery merger
  • De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
  • Netherlands
  • April 9 2014

The District Court of Rotterdam recently upheld the decision by the Dutch Authority for Consumers & Markets to prohibit the transaction between two


Silence is golden: ex-employees do not have to snitch on former employers
  • De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
  • Netherlands
  • May 9 2013

The Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal has resolved a long-running dispute on the scope of a company's right to remain silent


Big brother deafened? ACM was wrong to use Public Prosecutor's telephone taps
  • De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
  • Netherlands
  • July 22 2013

The ACM's first personal cartel fines ever (see for more our Competition Newsletter of November 2010) were overturned by a recent ruling which


UK competition
  • De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
  • Netherlands, United Kingdom
  • April 30 2014

Judgment Court of Appeal (Civil Division) on appeal from the Competition Appeal Tribunal, OFT 1. Somerfield Stores Limited, 2. Co-operative Group


The ACM can base its cartel fine on EU-wide turnover instead of Dutch turnover
  • De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
  • European Union, Netherlands
  • May 12 2014

The District Court of Rotterdam upheld how the Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) calculated the fines imposed on a number of companies for


Nederland - jurisprudentie
  • De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
  • Netherlands
  • April 30 2014

College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven 10 April 2014, 1. Bedrijf sub 1, 2. Bedrijf sub 2 ACM (zaak AWB 10828, AWB 10829, ECLI:NL:CBB:2014:118