We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 507

Besluit van ACM in de AstraZeneca-zaak: van kartelparadijs naar monopolieparadijs?
  • Maverick Advocaten NV
  • Netherlands
  • December 29 2014

Onlangs maakte ACM bekend na vier jaar haar onderzoek naar mogelijk misbruik van machtspositie door AstraZeneca te sluiten. Onderwerp van dit


ACM’s decision in the AstraZeneca case: from cartel paradise to monopoly paradise?
  • Maverick Advocaten NV
  • Netherlands
  • January 5 2015

ACM recently announced that after four years it has closed its investigation into possible abuse of a dominant position by AstraZeneca. The


The Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal upheld a judgment annulling a fine in the home care sector due to a lack of conclusive evidence
  • Stibbe
  • Netherlands
  • January 6 2015

On 18 December 2014, the Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal ("Tribunal") upheld a judgment of the District Court of Rotterdam ("District Court"


Double Dutch: passing on defence available under Dutch law in private damages claims
  • Bryan Cave LLP
  • Netherlands
  • October 16 2014

The Netherlands is one of the most popular venues alongside the UK and Germany for bringing private damages actions in follow on actions relating to


District court anchors follow-on damages claim in the Netherlands
  • De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
  • Netherlands
  • July 31 2014

The District Court of Amsterdam recently found itself competent to rule on damages claims against the non-Dutch participants of a sodium chlorate


Commissie is helder: wanneer sprake is van een mededingingsbeperkend doel geldt geen veilige haven
  • Bird & Bird
  • Netherlands
  • July 2 2014

Op basis van vaste jurisprudentie van het Hof van Justitie vallen mededingingsbeperkende afspraken niet onder het kartelverbod, wanneer de afspraak


Court finds that ACM was not on a fishing expedition
  • De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
  • Netherlands
  • August 15 2013

In contrast to a decision of the Hague District Court the Court of Appeal of The Hague has ruled that the Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM


Groundbreaking judgment on cartel damages in the Netherlands
  • Boekel De Nerée
  • Netherlands
  • February 14 2013

For the first time a Dutch court has held a cartel member liable towards its direct purchaser for damages caused by a cartel that was sanctioned by


The ACM reduced cartel fines for launderettes for excessive duration of its own administrative procedure
  • Stibbe
  • Netherlands
  • September 1 2014

On 15 August 2014, the Dutch Authority for Consumers and Markets ("ACM") published its decision on the administrative appeal of four companies, which


Cartel members may argue that damage caused by cartel was passed on to customers
  • De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
  • Netherlands
  • October 13 2014

In line with earlier EU case law and the upcoming Directive on damages claims, a Dutch court of appeal has ruled that cartel members can invoke a