We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 2,563

West Virginia AG clears merger creating second largest hospital chain in the state with conduct remedy
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • August 3 2015

The federal antitrust enforcement agencies have trumpeted their preferences for structural, as opposed to conduct, remedies as the solution to


This isn't North Carolina, toto: California Boards should survive the Dental Board case
  • Nossaman LLP
  • USA
  • August 1 2015

In February of this year, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade


Reverse payment settlements subject to antitrust challenge
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 30 2015

In a class action case assessing the implications of antitrust law in a patent infringement and validity settlement agreement, the Supreme Court of


Third Circuit extends Actavis to reverse settlement agreements involving non-cash consideration
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 29 2015

Addressing for the first time whether reverse settlement agreements involving non-cash consideration merit antitrust scrutiny, the U.S. Court of


FTC’s challenge to Family DollarDollar Tree merger suggests potential for significant increase in merger enforcement
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • July 27 2015

The Federal Trade Commission preliminarily approved a settlement to resolve its concerns that the acquisition of Family Dollar Stores, Inc. by Dollar


Regulators sue four Michigan hospitals for agreeing to restrict marketing activities
  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • USA
  • July 22 2015

As most people know, agreements between competitors to fix prices or allocate or divide markets are clear violations of the antitrust laws and can


FTC comment: Minnesota law requiring public disclosure of health care contract data increases risk of anticompetitive behavior
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 14 2015

On June 29, 2015, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) responded to a request for comment from two Minnesota state legislators concerning recently


Department of Justice sues four Michigan hospitals for allocating marketing territories
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • July 9 2015

On June 25, 2015, the U.S. Department of Justice ("DOJ") and the Michigan Attorney General jointly filed a lawsuit against four Michigan hospital


First federal appellate court holds a noncash reverse payment subject to antitrust scrutiny: is the Third Circuit's decision in King Drug a turning point?
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • July 9 2015

Recently, the Third Circuit issued the first federal appellate decision interpreting the Supreme Court's landmark decision in FTC v. Actavis, Inc


Third Circuit allows pay-for-delay suit despite no cash payment
  • Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
  • USA
  • July 7 2015

On June 26, 2015, the Third Circuit extended Actavis to non-cash settlements and held that Actavis can cover a no-AG agreement - "a settlement in